Journal of the Learning Sciences

665 papers and 48.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 665 papers published in Journal of the Learning Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 48.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of the Learning Sciences usually cover Education (394 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (384 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (77 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (305 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (105 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Learning Sciences are Ann L. Brown, Brigid Barron, Michelene T.H., Roy Pea, Jeremy Roschelle, Carl Bereiter, Marlene Scardamalia, Sasha A. Barab, Kurt Squire and Brian J. Reiser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of the Learning Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Learning Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Learning Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Learning Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Learning Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Learning Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Learning Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025