Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications
2001534 citationsSusan N. Friel, Frances R. Curcio et al.Journal for Research in Mathematics Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by George W. Bright
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Bright. The network helps show where George W. Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George W. Bright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George W. Bright.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George W. Bright based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George W. Bright. George W. Bright is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bright, George W., et al.. (2002). Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios, and Proportions: 2002 Yearbook.69 indexed citations
Vacc, Nancy Nesbitt, et al.. (1998). Changing Teacher's Beliefs through Professional Development..1 indexed citations
5.
Friel, Susan N., George W. Bright, & Frances R. Curcio. (1997). Understanding Students' Understanding of Graphs.. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 3(3).12 indexed citations
Bright, George W.. (1988). Using a Local Area Network in a College of Education.. 15(8). 90–93.
11.
Bright, George W.. (1988). Time-on-Task in Computer and Non-Computer Estimation Games.. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 7(4). 41–46.4 indexed citations
12.
Bright, George W.. (1987). Computers for Diagnosis and Prescription in Mathematics.. Focus on learning problems in mathematics. 9(2). 29–41.3 indexed citations
13.
Behr, Merlyn J., et al.. (1984). Research problems in mathematics education - III. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 4(3).2 indexed citations
14.
Bright, George W.. (1984). Computer Diagnosis of Errors. School Science and Mathematics. 84(3). 208–219.2 indexed citations
15.
Bright, George W.. (1981). Student Procedures in Solving Equations..1 indexed citations
Bright, George W.. (1978). Cognitive Effects of Games on Mathematics Learning. A Revision of a Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Cincinnati, Ohio, April 1977)..3 indexed citations
18.
Bright, George W., et al.. (1973). Teaching Children to Think Metric.. NEA today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.