Debra R. Comer
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- Co-authors
- Gina VegaLeslie E. SekerkaCharles H. SmithSusan D. BakerLindsey N. GodwinMichael SchwartzKaushik SenguptaDaphna Motro
- Topics
- Ethics in Business and Education (13 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers)Management and Marketing Education (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementInformation Systems and ManagementSocial Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Debra R. Comer
44 papers receiving 910 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Social Psychology 343
- Sociology and Political Science 323
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 311
- Education 202
- Information Systems and Management 186
Countries citing papers authored by Debra R. Comer
This map shows the geographic impact of Debra R. Comer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra R. Comer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra R. Comer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debra R. Comer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra R. Comer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra R. Comer. The network helps show where Debra R. Comer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra R. Comer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra R. Comer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra R. Comer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra R. Comer. Debra R. Comer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | Employees' Attitudes toward Fitness-for-Duty Testing | 2 |
| 16 | Organizational Efforts to Manage Diversity: Do They Really Work? | 23 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 94 |
About Debra R. Comer
Debra R. Comer is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (311 citations), Information Systems and Management (186 citations) and Social Psychology (343 citations). Debra R. Comer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Gina Vega, Leslie E. Sekerka, Charles H. Smith, Susan D. Baker, Lindsey N. Godwin, Michael Schwartz, Kaushik Sengupta, Daphna Motro, Elizabeth Cooper and Michael Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Organization Science and Journal of Business Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.