David L. Coker
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Kristen D. RitcheyBarbara Alexander PanMeredith L. RoweWilliam C. LewisElizabeth Farley‐RippleCharles A. MacArthurGina BiancarosaConnie Juel
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (22 papers)Writing and Handwriting Education (22 papers)Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Educational PsychologyJournal of Counseling PsychologyContemporary Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
David L. Coker
26 papers receiving 628 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Education 558
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 504
- Language and Linguistics 156
- Literature and Literary Theory 108
- Clinical Psychology 59
Countries citing papers authored by David L. Coker
This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Coker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Coker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Coker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Coker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Coker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Coker. The network helps show where David L. Coker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David L. Coker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David L. Coker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David L. Coker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David L. Coker. David L. Coker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 60 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | Writing instruction for young children: Methods targeting the multiple demands that writers face. | 9 |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 134 | |
| 19 | Walking with Rosie: A Cautionary Tale of Early Reading Instruction. | 40 |
| 20 | 13 |
About David L. Coker
David L. Coker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 27 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (22 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (22 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (504 citations), Education (558 citations) and Language and Linguistics (156 citations). David L. Coker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kristen D. Ritchey, Barbara Alexander Pan, Meredith L. Rowe, William C. Lewis, Elizabeth Farley‐Ripple, Charles A. MacArthur, Gina Biancarosa, Connie Juel, Jeffrey R. Harring and Rebecca D. Silverman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology and Contemporary Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.