David Coniam

2.2k citations
87 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

David Coniam

71 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David Coniam
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Language and Linguistics 475
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 386
  • Literature and Literary Theory 328
  • Communication 144
  • Computer Science Applications 105
Replace Deborah Healey with:
Deborah Healey Australia
Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan Malaysia
Mike Levy Australia
Jack Burston Cyprus
Christine B. Feak United States
Nicky Hockly Colombia
Wen‐Ta Tseng Taiwan
Glenn Stockwell Japan
Hilary Nesi United Kingdom
Davida Charney United States
David Coniam relative to Deborah Healey Australia Deborah Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Deborah Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Coniam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Coniam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Coniam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Coniam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Coniam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Coniam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Coniam. The network helps show where David Coniam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Coniam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Coniam Line = papers co-authored together David Coniam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008216
2 2013121
3 2020120
4 200187
5 201483
6 199668
7 199949
8 200847
9 200435
10 200924
11 200223
12 200621
13 199820
14 200519
15 200419
16 200918
17 201218
18
Computer-Mediated Communication and Teacher Education: The Case of "Telenex.".
199416
19 201314
20 201713

About David Coniam

David Coniam is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (33 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (20 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (19 papers), Educational Technology and Assessment (10 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (10 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers) and Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (475 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (386 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (328 citations), Communication (144 citations) and Computer Science Applications (105 citations). David Coniam has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Barley Mak, Icy Lee, Luke K. Fryer, Zi Yan, Zhao Wen, Yangyu Xiao, Christopher G. Dowson, Peter Bodycott, Allan Walker and Ming Ming Chiu. Their work appears in journals such as System, CALICO Journal, Language Awareness, BioTechniques and Computer Assisted Language Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact