Dana Gabrovská
- Food Science top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Plant Science
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Topics
- Food composition and properties (6 papers)Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers)Microbial Inactivation Methods (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Dana Gabrovská
25 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Food Science 127
- Nutrition and Dietetics 126
- Gastroenterology 114
- Plant Science 112
- Biotechnology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Gabrovská
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Gabrovská's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Gabrovská with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Gabrovská more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Gabrovská
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Gabrovská. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Gabrovská. The network helps show where Dana Gabrovská may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Gabrovská
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Gabrovská. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Gabrovská based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Gabrovská. Dana Gabrovská is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 58 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | ELISA kit for determination of egg white proteins: interlaboratory study. | 3 |
| 7 | Monitoring of daily gliadin intake in patients on gluten-free diets. | 2 |
| 8 | Evaluation of emmer wheat genetics resources aimed at dietary food production | 3 |
| 9 | Food with addition of little-known legume varieties | 8 |
| 10 | ELISA kit for casein determination: interlaboratory study. | 3 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | Antimutagenní aktivita brokolicové šťávy ošetřené vysokýmtlakem | 2 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Dana Gabrovská
Dana Gabrovská is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Physiology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 27 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food composition and properties (6 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (114 citations), Biotechnology (78 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (50 citations). Dana Gabrovská has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include J Nevoral, P Frič, Milan Houška, Jana Rysová, Pavel Dostálek, A. Hernando, Eduardo Méndez, Igor Hochel, Kateřina Vaculová and Vlasta Fiedlerová. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Engineering, Nutrition Reviews and Journal of Food Composition and Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.