Dale Baker

810 total citations
50 papers, 497 citations indexed

About

Dale Baker is a scholar working on Education, Media Technology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dale Baker has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 497 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Education, 16 papers in Media Technology and 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dale Baker's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (12 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (11 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers). Dale Baker is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (12 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (11 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers). Dale Baker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Dale Baker's co-authors include Stephen Krause, Chell Roberts, N. J. Schweitzer, Evan F. Risko, Şenay Purzer, Simone Silvestri, David R. Musser, D.H. Thompson, Susan L. Gerhart and Ralph L. London and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cognition and Journal of Engineering Education.

In The Last Decade

Dale Baker

44 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dale Baker United States	11	187	99	89	60	58	50	497
Nathan Mentzer United States	13	313 1.7×	108 1.1×	114 1.3×	39 0.7×	41 0.7×	79	598
Carla Zoltowski United States	13	330 1.8×	295 3.0×	22 0.2×	52 0.9×	88 1.5×	117	784
Allison Moore United Kingdom	9	358 1.9×	120 1.2×	165 1.9×	23 0.4×	32 0.6×	17	628
Kerrie Douglas United States	13	291 1.6×	96 1.0×	122 1.4×	30 0.5×	36 0.6×	114	601
Christa Jackson United States	12	476 2.5×	83 0.8×	167 1.9×	26 0.4×	169 2.9×	44	765
Jeremy V. Ernst United States	12	220 1.2×	69 0.7×	133 1.5×	22 0.4×	33 0.6×	83	471
Paul J. Camp United States	3	455 2.4×	95 1.0×	322 3.6×	34 0.6×	31 0.5×	7	742
Amy M. Johnson United States	15	309 1.7×	64 0.6×	419 4.7×	21 0.3×	38 0.7×	33	728
Gamze Özoğul United States	17	449 2.4×	82 0.8×	338 3.8×	24 0.4×	48 0.8×	41	830
Danielle B. Harlow United States	17	379 2.0×	77 0.8×	297 3.3×	10 0.2×	41 0.7×	79	827

Countries citing papers authored by Dale Baker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dale Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dale Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dale Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dale Baker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dale Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dale Baker. The network helps show where Dale Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dale Baker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dale Baker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dale Baker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dale Baker. Dale Baker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2023). Don’t touch that dial: Psychological reactance, transparency, and user acceptance of smart thermostat setting changes. PLoS ONE. 18(7). e0289017–e0289017. 6 indexed citations

Baker, Dale. (2020). Four Ironies of Self-quantification: Wearable Technologies and the Quantified Self. Science and Engineering Ethics. 26(3). 1477–1498. 21 indexed citations

Silvestri, Simone, et al.. (2020). Perceived-Value-driven Optimization of Energy Consumption in Smart Homes. Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.). 1(2). 1–26. 14 indexed citations

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2020). A Valid And Reliable Survey Instrument For Measuring K 12 Teachers' Perceptions And Needs On Design, Engineering, And Technology. 11.138.1–11.138.15. 2 indexed citations

Baker, Dale & Stephen Krause. (2020). Do Tinkering And Technical Activities Connect Engineering Education Standards With The Engineering Profession In Today’s World?. 12.561.1–12.561.11. 1 indexed citations

Baker, Dale, Stephen Krause, Monica Elser, et al.. (2020). Learning Through Engineering Design And Practice: Implementation And Impact Of A Middle School Engineering Education Program. 15.837.1–15.837.24. 4 indexed citations

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2015). Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias. Public Understanding of Science. 26(2). 251–258. 16 indexed citations

Baker, Dale. (2015). The “Second Place” Problem: Assistive Technology in Sports and (Re) Constructing Normal. Science and Engineering Ethics. 22(1). 93–110. 7 indexed citations

Schweitzer, N. J., Dale Baker, & Evan F. Risko. (2013). Fooled by the brain: Re-examining the influence of neuroimages. Cognition. 129(3). 501–511. 33 indexed citations

10.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2013). Visual Attention and the Neuroimage Bias. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e74449–e74449. 12 indexed citations

11.

Baker, Dale, N. J. Schweitzer, & Evan F. Risko. (2013). Perceived Access to Self-relevant Information Mediates Judgments of Privacy Violations in Neuromonitoring and Other Monitoring Technologies. Neuroethics. 7(1). 43–50. 5 indexed citations

12.

Baker, Dale. (2013). What Works: Using Curriculum and Pedagogy to Increase Girls' Interest and Participation in Science. Theory Into Practice. 52(1). 14–20. 50 indexed citations

13.

Krause, Stephen, et al.. (2010). An Atomic bonding module for materials engineering that elicits and addresses misconceptions with "Concept-in-Context" multimodal activities, worksheets, problems, and assessments. 1 indexed citations

14.

Krause, Stephen, et al.. (2010). Effect of pedagogy on conceptual change in an introductory materials science course. International journal of engineering education. 26(4). 869–879. 14 indexed citations

15.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2010). Uncovering atomic bonding misconceptions with multimodal topic module assessments of student understanding in an introductory materials course. 3 indexed citations

16.

Baker, Dale, Şenay Purzer, Sharon E. Robinson Kurpius, Stephen Krause, & Chell Roberts. (2007). Infusing design, engineering, and technology into K-12 teachers’ practice. International journal of engineering education. 23(5). 884–893. 5 indexed citations

17.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2006). Development of a Survey to Assess K‐12 Teachers' Perceptions of Engineers and Familiarity with Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology. Journal of Engineering Education. 95(3). 205–216. 146 indexed citations

18.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2004). Developing a method to measure the metacognitive effects of a course on design, engineering and technology over time. 3117–3128. 1 indexed citations

19.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (1999). Winners and Losers in Single-Sex Science and Mathematics Classrooms.. 5 indexed citations

20.

Gerhart, Susan L., David R. Musser, D.H. Thompson, et al.. (1980). An Overview of AFFIRM: A Specification and Verification System.. IFIP Congress. 2(1). 343–347. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact