Science and Engineering Ethics

1.8k papers and 30.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Science and Engineering Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 30.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Science and Engineering Ethics usually cover Safety Research (417 papers), Information Systems and Management (367 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (339 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Business and Education (249 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (225 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (223 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science and Engineering Ethics are Luciano Floridi, David Alexander, David B. Resnik, Joseph R. Herkert, Aimee van Wynsberghe, Mark Ryan, Mark Coeckelbergh, Nicholas H. Steneck, Brent Mittelstadt and Michael Davis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science and Engineering Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science and Engineering Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science and Engineering Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Science and Engineering Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science and Engineering Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science and Engineering Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science and Engineering Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025