N. J. Schweitzer

846 citations
24 papers · 490 indexed · h-index 13

N. J. Schweitzer

23 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

N. J. Schweitzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 209
  • Social Psychology 178
  • Law 75
  • General Social Sciences 21
  • Communication 36
Replace Dean Knox with:
Dean Knox United States
Laura Smalarz United States
Jason Chin Australia
Daniel Gile France
Robert K. Bothwell United States
Ana P. Gantman United States
Peter J. Neufeld United States
Nicholas Scurich United States
Nancy K. Steblay United States
Nadja Schreiber Compo United States
N. J. Schweitzer relative to Dean Knox United States Dean Knox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Dean Knox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. J. Schweitzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. J. Schweitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. J. Schweitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. J. Schweitzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. J. Schweitzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. J. Schweitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. J. Schweitzer. The network helps show where N. J. Schweitzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside N. J. Schweitzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. J. Schweitzer Line = papers co-authored together N. J. Schweitzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20225
2 20224
3 20214
4 20191
5 201816
6 201516
7
A Multiattribute Utility Analysis of Legal System Responses to Medical Injuries
20140
8 201327
9 201333
10 201312
11 20135
12
Jurors and Scientific Causation: What Don’t They Know, and What Can Be Done About it?
20122
13 201147
14
Neuroimages as Evidence in a Mens Rea Defense: No Impact
20114
15 201169
16 200923
17 20091
18 200831
19
The CSI Effect: Popular Fiction About Forensic Science Affects the Public's Expectations About Real Forensic Science
2007104
20
Rule Violations and the Rule of Law: A Factorial Survey of Public Attitudes
20062

About N. J. Schweitzer

N. J. Schweitzer is a scholar working on Law, General Social Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (12 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (209 citations), Social Psychology (178 citations) and Law (75 citations). N. J. Schweitzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Saks, Adina L. Roskies, Evan F. Risko, Dale Baker, Emily R. Murphy, Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong, Eyal Aharoni, Kent A. Kiehl, Jonathan J. Koehler and Jessica M. Salerno. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Public Policy and Law, Law and Human Behavior, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies and Behavioral Sciences & the Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026