Chell Roberts

572 total citations
44 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Chell Roberts is a scholar working on Media Technology, Architecture and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Chell Roberts has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Media Technology, 14 papers in Architecture and 11 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Recurrent topics in Chell Roberts's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (15 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (14 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (6 papers). Chell Roberts is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (15 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (14 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (6 papers). Chell Roberts collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Chell Roberts's co-authors include Stephen Krause, Dale Baker, Yasser Dessouky, Susan Lord, Dale C. Baker, Mark Henderson, Dan Shunk, Şenay Purzer, Michelle Camacho and Darryl Morrell and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Industrial Engineering, Computers in Industry and Journal of Engineering Education.

In The Last Decade

Chell Roberts

40 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Chell Roberts United States	8	155	110	80	56	50	44	366
George Toye United States	11	124 0.8×	145 1.3×	85 1.1×	21 0.4×	105 2.1×	28	480
Roxanne Moore United States	10	85 0.5×	52 0.5×	30 0.4×	38 0.7×	90 1.8×	49	325
Molly Goldstein United States	8	131 0.8×	70 0.6×	33 0.4×	61 1.1×	156 3.1×	46	315
Aaron C. Clark United States	10	145 0.9×	42 0.4×	19 0.2×	74 1.3×	22 0.4×	70	386
Jacob Perrenet Netherlands	11	405 2.6×	272 2.5×	44 0.6×	192 3.4×	35 0.7×	24	724
Sasha Nikolic Australia	13	193 1.2×	180 1.6×	33 0.4×	48 0.9×	27 0.5×	42	559
Camilo Vieira United States	14	215 1.4×	147 1.3×	27 0.3×	193 3.4×	63 1.3×	64	733
Renee Clark United States	16	321 2.1×	210 1.9×	30 0.4×	92 1.6×	49 1.0×	70	562
Jay McCormack United States	9	73 0.5×	102 0.9×	86 1.1×	9 0.2×	211 4.2×	42	386
Hakan Akçay Türkiye	15	523 3.4×	94 0.9×	4 0.1×	166 3.0×	20 0.4×	62	742

Countries citing papers authored by Chell Roberts

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chell Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chell Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chell Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chell Roberts

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chell Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chell Roberts. The network helps show where Chell Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chell Roberts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chell Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chell Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chell Roberts. Chell Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (2024). Exploring a New Mentorship Model: From One-on-One to Flash Mentoring. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 1 indexed citations

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2020). A Valid And Reliable Survey Instrument For Measuring K 12 Teachers' Perceptions And Needs On Design, Engineering, And Technology. 11.138.1–11.138.15. 2 indexed citations

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (2020). An Update On The Implementation Of A New Multidisciplinary Engineering Program. 12.236.1–12.236.10. 3 indexed citations

Baker, Dale, Stephen Krause, Monica Elser, et al.. (2020). Learning Through Engineering Design And Practice: Implementation And Impact Of A Middle School Engineering Education Program. 15.837.1–15.837.24. 4 indexed citations

Krause, Stephen, Dale Baker, & Chell Roberts. (2020). In Her Shoes: How Team Interactions Affect Engineering Self Efficacy. 12.866.1–12.866.15. 5 indexed citations

Henderson, Mark, et al.. (2020). Developing A Multidisciplinary Engineering Program At Arizona State University’s East Campus. 10.429.1–10.429.16. 4 indexed citations

Middleton, James A., D.L. Evans, P.E. Crouch, et al.. (2020). Design, Engineering, And Technological Expansion For K 12 Teachers. 8.378.1–8.378.17. 3 indexed citations

Roberts, Chell & Susan Lord. (2020). Making Engineering Sociotechnical. 1–4. 12 indexed citations

Purzer, Şenay, Dale Baker, Chell Roberts, & Stephen Krause. (2020). Development Of A Team Interaction Observation Protocol And A Self Efficacy Survey Using Social Cognitive Theory As A Framework. 13.415.1–13.415.15. 3 indexed citations

10.

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (2018). Work In Progress: Developing Changemaking Engineers (Year 2). 8 indexed citations

11.

Baker, Dale, Şenay Purzer, Sharon E. Robinson Kurpius, Stephen Krause, & Chell Roberts. (2007). Infusing design, engineering, and technology into K-12 teachers’ practice. International journal of engineering education. 23(5). 884–893. 5 indexed citations

12.

Wang, Jinnan, et al.. (2007). Local and Global Accessibility Evaluation with Tool Geometry. Computer-Aided Design and Applications. 4(1-4). 19–29. 2 indexed citations

13.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2006). Development of a Survey to Assess K‐12 Teachers' Perceptions of Engineers and Familiarity with Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology. Journal of Engineering Education. 95(3). 205–216. 146 indexed citations

14.

Henderson, Mark, et al.. (2005). A Clean Slate: Designing a Mechanical Systems Concentration Within a New Engineering Program. 129–135. 1 indexed citations

15.

Baker, Dale, et al.. (2004). Developing a method to measure the metacognitive effects of a course on design, engineering and technology over time. 3117–3128. 1 indexed citations

16.

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (1998). An improved methodology for evaluating the producibility of partially specified part designs. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 11(2). 153–172. 8 indexed citations

17.

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (1997). Manufacturing evaluation using resource-based, template-free features. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 8(4). 323–331. 3 indexed citations

18.

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (1997). A Framework for Representing and Computing Tool Accessibility. 9 indexed citations

19.

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (1991). The separation and explicit declaration of model control structures in support of object-oriented simulation. Winter Simulation Conference. 1173–1179. 1 indexed citations

20.

Roberts, Chell, et al.. (1991). Object oriented simulation tools necessary for a flexible batch process management architecture. Winter Simulation Conference. 323–330. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact