John W. Lewis

175 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

John W. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Physiology 564
  • Organic Chemistry 408
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 370
Replace Per Lindberg with:
Per Lindberg Sweden
Louis Lasagna United States
Ivan Diamond United States
Frédéric Y. Bois France
Thomas Ostermann Germany
Michael Williams United States
Gilbert Geis United States
Ben Freedman Australia
Lawrence D. Phillips United Kingdom
Meyer Friedman United Kingdom
John W. Lewis relative to Per Lindberg Sweden Per Lindberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Per Lindberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Lewis. The network helps show where John W. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Lewis. John W. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2
The vulnerability assessment for emergency response plans
1
3
Understanding the Role of Social Capital in Integrating Health Information Systems
1
4 37
5 3
6 2
7
Strengthening Metis Around Routine Health Information Systems in Developing Countries
8
8 44
9 163
10 3
11 32
12
Mapping wildfire hazards and risks. Indexing resource data workshop, Pingree Park, Colorado, USA, 29 September-4 October, 1996.
1
13 9
14 8
15 25
16 14
17 9
18 12
19 14
20 39

About John W. Lewis

John W. Lewis is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 185 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (44 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (36 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (140 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (138 citations). John W. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. Husbands, A. Cowan, Cleopatra Veloutsou, Robert A. Paton, Jack H. Ladenson, James C. Boyd, John R. Traynor, K. Singer, Antonio Tagarelli and Cinzia Benincasa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Analytical Chemistry and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026