Cedric Linder

3.2k total citations
101 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Cedric Linder is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Cedric Linder has authored 101 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Education, 44 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 13 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Cedric Linder's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (36 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (25 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (20 papers). Cedric Linder is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (36 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (25 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (20 papers). Cedric Linder collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, South Africa and Canada. Cedric Linder's co-authors include John Airey, Delia Marshall, Duncan Fraser, Leif Östman, Gaalen Erickson, Per‐Olof Wickman, Åke Ingerman, Mats Lindahl, Anna Danielsson and Urban Eriksson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Cedric Linder

90 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cedric Linder Sweden 25 1.6k 923 322 218 187 101 2.2k
Philip Scott United Kingdom 17 2.9k 1.8× 1.8k 1.9× 181 0.6× 165 0.8× 102 0.5× 26 3.5k
Bruce Sherin United States 21 1.7k 1.1× 1.2k 1.3× 99 0.3× 368 1.7× 85 0.5× 55 2.6k
José P. Mestre United States 24 2.5k 1.5× 1.4k 1.6× 73 0.2× 434 2.0× 420 2.2× 78 3.3k
Randi A. Engle United States 13 2.2k 1.4× 1.5k 1.6× 139 0.4× 190 0.9× 95 0.5× 22 3.1k
Jere Confrey United States 28 3.6k 2.2× 1.5k 1.6× 123 0.4× 214 1.0× 162 0.9× 106 4.8k
Nancy Butler Songer United States 21 1.9k 1.2× 1.7k 1.8× 97 0.3× 383 1.8× 90 0.5× 53 2.9k
Eduardo Fleury Mortimer Brazil 22 3.4k 2.1× 1.8k 2.0× 249 0.8× 163 0.7× 62 0.3× 102 4.0k
Vaughan Prain Australia 31 2.5k 1.5× 1.5k 1.6× 329 1.0× 481 2.2× 41 0.2× 110 3.2k
Jon Ogborn United Kingdom 22 1.1k 0.7× 730 0.8× 146 0.5× 149 0.7× 30 0.2× 62 1.7k
Michael Russell United States 29 1.7k 1.1× 538 0.6× 152 0.5× 80 0.4× 75 0.4× 90 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Cedric Linder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cedric Linder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cedric Linder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cedric Linder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cedric Linder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cedric Linder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cedric Linder. The network helps show where Cedric Linder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cedric Linder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cedric Linder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cedric Linder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cedric Linder. Cedric Linder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (2024). Relationship between semiotic representations and student performance in the context of refraction. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 20(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (2021). Qualitatively different ways of unpacking visual representations when teaching intermolecular forces in upper secondary school. Science Education. 105(6). 1173–1201. 16 indexed citations
4.
Gregorcic, Bor, et al.. (2020). Learning to use Cartesian coordinate systems to solve physics problems: the case of ‘movability’. European Journal of Physics. 41(4). 45701–45701. 10 indexed citations
5.
Airey, John, et al.. (2020). Developing representational competence: linking real-world motion to physics concepts through graphs. Learning Research and Practice. 6(1). 88–107. 21 indexed citations
6.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (2019). Towards understanding learning challenges involving sign conventions in introductory level kinematics. Högskolan Kristianstad Publikationer. 1 indexed citations
7.
Airey, John, et al.. (2018). Physics students learning about abstract mathematical tools when engaging with �invisible� phenomena. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 408–411. 5 indexed citations
8.
Wikman, Susanne, et al.. (2017). Teachers’ reasoning: Classroom visual representational practices in the context of introductory chemical bonding. Science Education. 101(6). 887–906. 21 indexed citations
9.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (2015). A social semiotic approach to identifying critical aspects. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. 4(3). 302–316. 23 indexed citations
10.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (2014). Considering student retention as a complex system: a possible way forward for enhancing student retention. European Journal of Engineering Education. 40(3). 235–255. 15 indexed citations
11.
Mann, Richard P., et al.. (2014). Sandbox University: Estimating Influence of Institutional Action. PLoS ONE. 9(7). e103261–e103261. 14 indexed citations
12.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (2012). A new approach to modelling student retention through an application of complexity thinking. Studies in Higher Education. 39(1). 68–86. 35 indexed citations
13.
Airey, John, et al.. (2012). An exploration of university physics students’ epistemological mindsets towards the understanding of physics equations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 15–28. 24 indexed citations
14.
Case, Jennifer, Delia Marshall, & Cedric Linder. (2010). Being a student again: a narrative study of a teacher's experience. Teaching in Higher Education. 15(4). 423–433. 16 indexed citations
15.
Danielsson, Anna & Cedric Linder. (2008). Learning in physics by doing laboratory work: towards a new conceptual framework. Gender and Education. 21(2). 129–144. 29 indexed citations
16.
Fraser, Duncan, et al.. (2006). Using Variation to Enhance Learning in Engineering. International journal of engineering education. 22(1). 102–108. 18 indexed citations
17.
Adawi, Tom & Cedric Linder. (2005). What’s hot and what’s not: A phenomenographic study of lay adults’ conceptions of heat and temperature. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 5 indexed citations
18.
Fraser, Duncan M., et al.. (2005). Learning through Simulation : Student Engagement. Chemical Engineering Education. 39(4). 288–295. 15 indexed citations
19.
Linder, Cedric & Delia Marshall. (2003). Reflection and phenomenography: towards theoretical and educational development possibilities. Learning and Instruction. 13(3). 271–284. 84 indexed citations
20.
Linder, Cedric, et al.. (1997). Physics tutors’ metalearning development through an extension of Schön's reflective practice. International Journal of Science Education. 19(7). 821–833. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Philip Scott Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bruce Sherin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José P. Mestre Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Randi A. Engle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jere Confrey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nancy Butler Songer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eduardo Fleury Mortimer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vaughan Prain Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jon Ogborn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Russell
Rankless by CCL
2026