Camilla Gilmore
- Statistics and Probability top 0.05%
- Education top 0.1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Lucy CraggMatthew InglisBert De SmedtElizabeth S. SpelkeShannon McCarthySarah ClaytonSamantha JohnsonNina Attridge
- Topics
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (75 papers)Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (51 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (26 papers)
- Journals
- NaturePLoS ONEChild Development
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Camilla Gilmore
85 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Statistics and Probability 3.6k
- Education 3.0k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 815
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 394
Countries citing papers authored by Camilla Gilmore
This map shows the geographic impact of Camilla Gilmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Camilla Gilmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Camilla Gilmore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Camilla Gilmore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Camilla Gilmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Camilla Gilmore. The network helps show where Camilla Gilmore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Camilla Gilmore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Camilla Gilmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Camilla Gilmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Camilla Gilmore. Camilla Gilmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 187 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 83 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 38 |
About Camilla Gilmore
Camilla Gilmore is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 96 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (75 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (51 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (3.6k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.2k citations) and Education (3.0k citations). Camilla Gilmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Cragg, Matthew Inglis, Bert De Smedt, Elizabeth S. Spelke, Shannon McCarthy, Sarah Clayton, Samantha Johnson, Nina Attridge, Daniel Ansari and Marie‐Pascale Noël. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.