Lucy Cragg

3.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
44 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Lucy Cragg is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Lucy Cragg has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 21 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Lucy Cragg's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (21 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (10 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). Lucy Cragg is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (21 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (10 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). Lucy Cragg collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Lucy Cragg's co-authors include Camilla Gilmore, Kate Nation, Samantha Johnson, Victoria Simms, Sarah Clayton, Neil Marlow, Sarah Keeble, Madeleine J. Groom, Matthew Inglis and Nicolas Chevalier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Lucy Cragg

43 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive func... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2014 2013 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lucy Cragg United Kingdom 27 1.1k 1.1k 1.0k 953 527 44 2.6k
Liane Kaufmann Austria 32 1.6k 1.4× 2.3k 2.1× 916 0.9× 1.5k 1.6× 397 0.8× 88 3.1k
Catherine Willis United Kingdom 14 2.4k 2.1× 769 0.7× 1.2k 1.2× 557 0.6× 534 1.0× 19 3.0k
Elise Temple United States 18 1.5k 1.3× 849 0.8× 1.5k 1.5× 360 0.4× 328 0.6× 22 2.5k
Zvia Breznitz Israel 30 2.0k 1.8× 849 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 656 0.7× 241 0.5× 89 2.6k
Robin L. Peterson United States 20 1.5k 1.3× 547 0.5× 945 0.9× 361 0.4× 230 0.4× 40 2.2k
Mauro Pesenti Belgium 34 1.5k 1.3× 2.6k 2.4× 2.2k 2.1× 1.1k 1.1× 588 1.1× 86 3.7k
Christina B. Young United States 21 206 0.2× 366 0.3× 998 1.0× 219 0.2× 518 1.0× 67 2.0k
Leo Blomert Netherlands 35 3.0k 2.7× 1.4k 1.3× 2.8k 2.7× 948 1.0× 1.6k 3.0× 58 4.6k
Paavo H. T. Leppänen Finland 39 3.5k 3.1× 1.1k 0.9× 2.8k 2.6× 867 0.9× 648 1.2× 114 4.8k
Elizabeth S. Norton United States 23 1.5k 1.3× 581 0.5× 1.4k 1.3× 397 0.4× 182 0.3× 67 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Lucy Cragg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucy Cragg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucy Cragg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucy Cragg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucy Cragg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucy Cragg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucy Cragg. The network helps show where Lucy Cragg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucy Cragg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucy Cragg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucy Cragg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucy Cragg. Lucy Cragg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
4.
Cragg, Lucy, et al.. (2022). Endogenous control is insufficient for preventing attentional capture in children and adults. Acta Psychologica. 228. 103611–103611. 5 indexed citations
5.
Johnson, Samantha, et al.. (2021). A comparison of simultaneous and sequential visuo-spatial memory in children born very preterm. Child Neuropsychology. 28(4). 496–509. 1 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Samantha, Vassiliki Bountziouka, Sarah Clayton, et al.. (2019). Improving developmental and educational support for children born preterm: evaluation of an e-learning resource for education professionals. BMJ Open. 9(6). e029720–e029720. 18 indexed citations
7.
Hirst, Rebecca J., et al.. (2018). The threshold for the McGurk effect in audio-visual noise decreases with development. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 12372–12372. 33 indexed citations
8.
Johnson, Samantha, et al.. (2018). Cognitive predictors of parent-rated inattention in very preterm children: The role of working memory and processing speed. Child Neuropsychology. 25(5). 617–635. 10 indexed citations
9.
Gilmore, Camilla, Sarah Clayton, Lucy Cragg, et al.. (2018). Understanding arithmetic concepts: The role of domain-specific and domain-general skills. PLoS ONE. 13(9). e0201724–e0201724. 15 indexed citations
10.
Cragg, Lucy, et al.. (2017). When is working memory important for arithmetic? The impact of strategy and age. PLoS ONE. 12(12). e0188693–e0188693. 44 indexed citations
11.
Cragg, Lucy, et al.. (2017). Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement. Cognition. 162. 12–26. 187 indexed citations
12.
Simms, Victoria, Sarah Clayton, Lucy Cragg, Camilla Gilmore, & Samantha Johnson. (2016). Explaining the relationship between number line estimation and mathematical achievement: The role of visuomotor integration and visuospatial skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 145. 22–33. 83 indexed citations
13.
Gilmore, Camilla, et al.. (2016). Congruency effects in dot comparison tasks: convex hull is more important than dot area. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 28(8). 923–931. 45 indexed citations
14.
Cragg, Lucy. (2015). The development of stimulus and response interference control in midchildhood.. Developmental Psychology. 52(2). 242–252. 48 indexed citations
15.
Groom, Madeleine J. & Lucy Cragg. (2015). Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition. Brain and Cognition. 97. 1–9. 133 indexed citations
16.
Simms, Victoria, Camilla Gilmore, Lucy Cragg, et al.. (2014). Nature and origins of mathematics difficulties in very preterm children: a different etiology than developmental dyscalculia. Pediatric Research. 77(2). 389–395. 64 indexed citations
17.
Gilmore, Camilla, Nina Attridge, Sarah Clayton, et al.. (2013). Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement. PLoS ONE. 8(6). e67374–e67374. 343 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Cragg, Lucy & Kate Nation. (2009). Shifting development in mid-childhood: The influence of between-task interference.. Developmental Psychology. 45(5). 1465–1479. 37 indexed citations
19.
Norbury, Courtenay, Jon Brock, Lucy Cragg, et al.. (2009). Eye‐movement patterns are associated with communicative competence in autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 50(7). 834–842. 146 indexed citations
20.
Cragg, Lucy & Kate Nation. (2008). Go or no‐go? Developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid‐childhood. Developmental Science. 11(6). 819–827. 95 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026