Matthew Inglis

4.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
109 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Matthew Inglis is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Inglis has authored 109 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Education, 61 papers in Statistics and Probability and 25 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Matthew Inglis's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (64 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (49 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (14 papers). Matthew Inglis is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (64 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (49 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (14 papers). Matthew Inglis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Matthew Inglis's co-authors include Camilla Gilmore, Lara Alcock, Nina Attridge, Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos, Adrian Simpson, Sarah Clayton, Hugues Lortie‐Forgues, Ian Jones, Sophie Batchelor and Lucy Cragg and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Inglis

104 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement

2013 343 citations Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge et al. PLoS ONE profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Matthew Inglis United Kingdom	29	2.2k	1.7k	986	355	337	109	3.0k
Eric Knuth United States	30	2.2k 1.0×	1.2k 0.7×	762 0.8×	68 0.2×	228 0.7×	72	2.6k
Dina Tirosh Israel	26	1.8k 0.8×	1.1k 0.7×	435 0.4×	90 0.3×	186 0.6×	87	2.1k
Karen C. Fuson United States	31	4.1k 1.9×	3.8k 2.2×	2.4k 2.4×	319 0.9×	368 1.1×	94	5.3k
Luis Radford Canada	29	2.2k 1.0×	679 0.4×	842 0.9×	127 0.4×	244 0.7×	134	2.9k
Frank Lester United States	18	3.5k 1.6×	1.7k 1.0×	1.4k 1.4×	91 0.3×	352 1.0×	50	4.1k
Nathalie Sinclair Canada	26	1.4k 0.7×	551 0.3×	495 0.5×	143 0.4×	225 0.7×	106	2.1k
Arthur J. Baroody United States	37	3.1k 1.4×	3.1k 1.8×	1.8k 1.8×	255 0.7×	338 1.0×	126	4.0k
Роза Лейкин Israel	27	1.7k 0.8×	744 0.4×	544 0.6×	274 0.8×	820 2.4×	93	2.4k
Jon R. Star United States	36	3.4k 1.5×	2.0k 1.2×	1.8k 1.8×	183 0.5×	1.0k 3.1×	127	4.8k
Analúcia D. Schliemann Brazil	17	1.6k 0.7×	791 0.5×	699 0.7×	103 0.3×	205 0.6×	45	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Inglis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Inglis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Inglis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Inglis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Inglis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Inglis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Inglis. The network helps show where Matthew Inglis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Inglis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Inglis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Inglis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Inglis. Matthew Inglis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gilmore, Camilla, et al.. (2025). Children’s early understanding of the successor function. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 11.

Gilmore, Camilla, et al.. (2025). Learning number notations – Comparison of a sign-value and place-value system. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 11. 1 indexed citations

Attridge, Nina, et al.. (2025). Numeracy, logical reasoning and real-world decision making. Research in Mathematics Education. 1–17.

Inglis, Matthew, Colin Foster, Hugues Lortie‐Forgues, & Elizabeth Stokoe. (2024). British education research and its quality: An analysis of Research Excellence Framework submissions. British Educational Research Journal. 50(5). 2495–2518. 1 indexed citations

Alcock, Lara, et al.. (2023). Do Mathematicians Agree about Mathematical Beauty?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 15(1). 299–325. 3 indexed citations

Adelman, James S., et al.. (2023). Are approximate number system representations numerical?. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 9(1). 129–144. 1 indexed citations

Mejía-Ramos, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2022). Do mathematicians and undergraduates agree about explanation quality?. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 111(3). 445–467. 6 indexed citations

Inglis, Matthew, et al.. (2022). Stereotype threat, gender and mathematics attainment: A conceptual replication of Stricker & Ward. PLoS ONE. 17(5). e0267699–e0267699. 2 indexed citations

Smedt, Bert De, et al.. (2022). Counting many as one: Young children can understand sets as units except when counting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 225. 105533–105533. 1 indexed citations

10.

Attridge, Nina, et al.. (2021). Cognitive performance in pain is predicted by effort, not goal desire. PLoS ONE. 16(11). e0258874–e0258874. 1 indexed citations

11.

Batchelor, Sophie, et al.. (2020). Iconicity in mathematical notation: Commutativity and symmetry. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 6(3). 378–392. 6 indexed citations

12.

Gilmore, Camilla, et al.. (2016). Congruency effects in dot comparison tasks: convex hull is more important than dot area. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 28(8). 923–931. 45 indexed citations

13.

Attridge, Nina, et al.. (2015). The development of reasoning skills during compulsory 16 to 18 mathematics education. Research in Mathematics Education. 17(1). 20–37. 8 indexed citations

14.

Weber, Keith, Matthew Inglis, & Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos. (2014). How Mathematicians Obtain Conviction: Implications for Mathematics Instruction and Research on Epistemic Cognition. Educational Psychologist. 49(1). 36–58. 51 indexed citations

15.

Iannone, Paola & Matthew Inglis. (2010). Undergraduate students’ use of deductive arguments to solve 'prove that…' tasks. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 4 indexed citations

16.

Iannone, Paola & Matthew Inglis. (2010). Self efficacy and mathematical proof: are undergraduate students good at assessing their own proof production ability?. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 17 indexed citations

17.

Inglis, Matthew & Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos. (2008). The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments. Cognition and Instruction. 27(1). 25–50. 73 indexed citations

18.

Inglis, Matthew & Adrian Simpson. (2005). Heuristic Biases in Mathematical Reasoning.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 3. 177–184. 4 indexed citations

19.

Inglis, Matthew & Adrian Simpson. (2004). MATHEMATICIANS AND THE SELECTION TASK. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 13 indexed citations

20.

Inglis, Matthew. (2003). Three Worlds and the Imaginary Sphere.. for the learning of mathematics. 23(3). 24–27. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact