Bob Campbell

1.2k total citations
34 papers, 761 citations indexed

About

Bob Campbell is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bob Campbell has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 761 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Education, 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Bob Campbell's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (16 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers). Bob Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (16 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers). Bob Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Bob Campbell's co-authors include Fred Lubben, Saalih Allie, Andy Buffler, Judith Bennett, Sylvia Hogarth, Alison Robinson, Hilary Constable, Martin Braund, David Waddington and Robin Millar and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Bob Campbell

31 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bob Campbell United Kingdom 14 579 254 60 60 55 34 761
Marissa Rollnick South Africa 18 937 1.6× 408 1.6× 49 0.8× 43 0.7× 110 2.0× 53 1.1k
Sylvia Hogarth United Kingdom 6 538 0.9× 292 1.1× 75 1.3× 24 0.4× 61 1.1× 8 744
Lawrence B. Flick United States 13 888 1.5× 432 1.7× 50 0.8× 59 1.0× 54 1.0× 37 1.0k
Brian E. Woolnough United Kingdom 18 783 1.4× 365 1.4× 84 1.4× 58 1.0× 84 1.5× 55 1.1k
Daiyo Sawada Canada 11 678 1.2× 187 0.7× 31 0.5× 88 1.5× 53 1.0× 41 819
Gavin W. Fulmer United States 18 650 1.1× 195 0.8× 37 0.6× 27 0.5× 50 0.9× 52 784
Hans E. Fischer Germany 15 778 1.3× 344 1.4× 106 1.8× 20 0.3× 86 1.6× 45 936
E.G. Harskamp Netherlands 17 586 1.0× 421 1.7× 130 2.2× 39 0.7× 51 0.9× 33 864
A. Leon Pines United States 4 889 1.5× 567 2.2× 93 1.6× 32 0.5× 44 0.8× 9 1.0k
Laura McCullough United States 13 516 0.9× 205 0.8× 81 1.4× 88 1.5× 32 0.6× 72 711

Countries citing papers authored by Bob Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Campbell. The network helps show where Bob Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bob Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bob Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bob Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bob Campbell. Bob Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Matrana, Marc & Bob Campbell. (2020). Precision Medicine and the Institutional Review Board: Ethics and the Genome. Ochsner Journal. 20(1). 98–103. 3 indexed citations
2.
Morgan, Cliff, et al.. (2012). The Role of the Academic Journal Publisher and Open Access Publishing Models. International Studies Perspectives. 13(3). 228–234. 9 indexed citations
3.
Campbell, Bob, John Willinsky, & Rick Anderson. (2010). Book Reviews. Learned Publishing. 23(3). 264–266. 3 indexed citations
4.
Bennett, Judith, Sylvia Hogarth, Fred Lubben, Bob Campbell, & Alison Robinson. (2009). Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 32(1). 69–95. 106 indexed citations
5.
Braund, Martin, et al.. (2006). A 'community of practice' to learn to teach about ideas and evidence in science. School science review. 87(321). 83–90. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bennett, Judith, Fred Lubben, Sylvia Hogarth, & Bob Campbell. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: rigour or rigidity?. International Journal of Science Education. 27(4). 387–406. 76 indexed citations
7.
Allie, Saalih, Andy Buffler, Bob Campbell, et al.. (2004). Authors' Response. The Physics Teacher. 42(2). 70–70. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rollnick, Marissa, Saalih Allie, Andy Buffler, Bob Campbell, & Fred Lubben. (2004). Development and application of a model for students' decision-making in laboratory work. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 8(1). 13–27. 5 indexed citations
9.
Allie, Saalih, et al.. (2003). Teaching Measurement in the Introductory Physics Laboratory. The Physics Teacher. 41(7). 394–401. 41 indexed citations
10.
Lubben, Fred, et al.. (2003). Teachers' Use of Textbooks: Practice in Namibian science classrooms. Educational Studies. 29(2-3). 109–125. 18 indexed citations
11.
Campbell, Bob & Fred Lubben. (2003). The provision of a health promoting environment for HIV/AIDS education: the case of Namibian senior secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Development. 23(5). 529–542. 10 indexed citations
12.
Bennett, Judith & Bob Campbell. (2002). First Steps in Educational Research: The Experience of Student Teachers.. School science review. 84(307). 49–59. 4 indexed citations
13.
Lubben, Fred, Bob Campbell, Andy Buffler, & Saalih Allie. (2001). Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entering university freshmen. Science Education. 85(4). 311–327. 60 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, Bob, et al.. (2000). The communication of laboratory investigations by university entrants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(8). 839–853. 26 indexed citations
15.
Lubben, Fred, et al.. (1999). Students' use of cultural metaphors and their scientific understandings related to heating. Science Education. 83(6). 761–774. 28 indexed citations
16.
Lubben, Fred, et al.. (1999). Students' use of cultural metaphors and their scientific understandings related to heating. Science Education. 83(6). 761–761. 4 indexed citations
17.
Lubben, Fred, et al.. (1998). Science Curriculum Material Development through a Teacher‐Industrialist Partnership: industrialists’ perceptions of their role. Research in Science & Technological Education. 16(2). 217–230. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lubben, Fred, et al.. (1996). Liked and Disliked Learning Activities: responses of Swazi students to science materials with a technological approach. Research in Science & Technological Education. 14(2). 221–235. 13 indexed citations
19.
Lubben, Fred, et al.. (1995). In-service support for a technological approach to science education - Education Research. 1 indexed citations
20.
Constable, Hilary, et al.. (1988). SECTIONAL DRAWINGS FROM SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION INTO PUPILS' UNDERSTANDING. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 58(1). 88–102. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026