Beth Clark

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
50 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Beth Clark is a scholar working on Plant Science, Small Animals and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Clark has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Plant Science, 13 papers in Small Animals and 13 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Beth Clark's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (10 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (8 papers). Beth Clark is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (10 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (8 papers). Beth Clark collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Netherlands. Beth Clark's co-authors include Lynn J. Frewer, Gavin Stewart, Luca Panzone, I. Kyriazakis, Helen Kendall, Sharron Kuznesof, Zhenhong Li, Paul Brereton, Guijun Yang and Shan Jin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Beth Clark

44 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analy... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beth Clark United Kingdom 21 460 424 414 321 190 50 1.8k
Philip Jones United Kingdom 23 405 0.9× 308 0.7× 386 0.9× 210 0.7× 77 0.4× 70 1.9k
Jesper Lassen Denmark 25 711 1.5× 266 0.6× 465 1.1× 316 1.0× 220 1.2× 62 2.0k
Luiza Toma United Kingdom 23 389 0.8× 310 0.7× 296 0.7× 167 0.5× 41 0.2× 70 1.7k
Callum Eastwood New Zealand 19 460 1.0× 243 0.6× 183 0.4× 263 0.8× 59 0.3× 53 1.6k
Luca Panzone United Kingdom 20 375 0.8× 365 0.9× 342 0.8× 306 1.0× 29 0.2× 54 1.7k
Nicole J. Olynk United States 14 463 1.0× 236 0.6× 286 0.7× 218 0.7× 35 0.2× 28 1.2k
Marta G. Rivera‐Ferre Spain 25 534 1.2× 525 1.2× 269 0.6× 78 0.2× 66 0.3× 79 1.8k
A. Bernués Spain 27 524 1.1× 958 2.3× 483 1.2× 151 0.5× 33 0.2× 91 3.1k
Christopher A. Wolf United States 29 531 1.2× 455 1.1× 277 0.7× 624 1.9× 114 0.6× 129 2.8k
P.B.M. Berentsen Netherlands 29 402 0.9× 840 2.0× 152 0.4× 183 0.6× 48 0.3× 94 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Clark. The network helps show where Beth Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Clark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Clark. Beth Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, Beth, Marian Raley, Francisco Areal, et al.. (2025). Consumer Attitudes to Combined Sustainability and Nutrition Labelling of Foods: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 49(6).
2.
3.
Clark, Beth, et al.. (2024). Animal health and welfare as a public good: what do the public think?. Agriculture and Human Values. 41(4). 1841–1856.
4.
Holloway, Lewis, et al.. (2024). Making a mark on the farm: the marks and traces of farm animals and infectious diseases in northern England. Scottish Geographical Journal. 140(3-4). 508–532. 3 indexed citations
5.
Clark, Beth, et al.. (2024). Exploring farmer and advisor lameness management behaviors using the COM-B model of behavior change. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 11. 1258906–1258906. 6 indexed citations
7.
Clark, Beth, et al.. (2023). In the shoes of a farmer: (re)connecting the public with animal health and welfare in livestock production. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 2 indexed citations
8.
Coles, David, et al.. (2022). Factors influencing consumption of traditional diets: stakeholder views regarding sago consumption among the indigenous peoples of West Papua. Agriculture & Food Security. 11(1). 51–51. 1 indexed citations
9.
Tiwasing, Pattanapong, Beth Clark, & Menelaos Gkartzios. (2022). How can rural businesses thrive in the digital economy? A UK perspective. Heliyon. 8(10). e10745–e10745. 39 indexed citations
10.
Holloway, Lewis, et al.. (2022). Changing interventions in farm animal health and welfare: A governmentality approach to the case of lameness. Journal of Rural Studies. 97. 95–104. 6 indexed citations
11.
Niemi, Jarkko K., Richard Bennett, Beth Clark, et al.. (2020). A value chain analysis of interventions to control production diseases in the intensive pig production sector. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0231338–e0231338. 22 indexed citations
12.
Rust, Niki, Lucy E. Ridding, Caroline Ward, et al.. (2020). How to transition to reduced-meat diets that benefit people and the planet. The Science of The Total Environment. 718. 137208–137208. 123 indexed citations
13.
Meijer, Nathan, Matthias Filter, Ákos Jóźwiak, et al.. (2020). Determination and Metrics for Emerging Risks Identification DEMETER: Final Report. EFSA Supporting Publications. 17(7). 4 indexed citations
14.
Clark, Beth, Luca Panzone, Gavin Stewart, et al.. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems. PLoS ONE. 14(1). e0210432–e0210432. 61 indexed citations
15.
Kendall, Helen, Sharron Kuznesof, Marian Raley, et al.. (2018). Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0195817–e0195817. 56 indexed citations
16.
Li, Zhenhai, Xingang Xu, Xiuliang Jin, et al.. (2018). Estimating genetic parameters of DSSAT-CERES model with the GLUE method for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 154. 213–221. 63 indexed citations
17.
Meijer, Nathan, Matthias Filter, Beth Clark, et al.. (2018). Project DEMETER: Concept Note for an Emerging Risks Knowledge Exchange Platform (ERKEP) Framework. EFSA Supporting Publications. 15(12). 3 indexed citations
18.
Giles, Emma L., Sharron Kuznesof, Beth Clark, Carmen Hubbard, & Lynn J. Frewer. (2015). Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 17(12). 467–467. 57 indexed citations
19.
Clark, Beth, Gavin Stewart, Luca Panzone, & Lynn J. Frewer. (2014). A protocol for a systematic review into consumers’ attitudes, beliefs and perceived ethical obligations towards farm animal welfare. 1 indexed citations
20.
Clark, Beth, Gavin Stewart, Luca Panzone, & Lynn J. Frewer. (2014). A protocol for a systematic review into consumers’ attitudes, beliefs and perceived ethical obligations towards farm animal welfare. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026