Jesper Lassen

3.1k total citations
62 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Jesper Lassen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Jesper Lassen has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Plant Science, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Jesper Lassen's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (12 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (12 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (11 papers). Jesper Lassen is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (12 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (12 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (11 papers). Jesper Lassen collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Jesper Lassen's co-authors include Peter Sandøe, Kia Ditlevsen, Lynn J. Frewer, Björn Forkman, Knut G Berdal, B. Kettlitz, V. Beekman, Joachim Scholderer, Sigrid Denver and Tove Christensen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Energy Policy and International Journal of Food Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Jesper Lassen

59 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jesper Lassen Denmark 25 711 465 416 318 316 62 2.0k
Nicole Olynk Widmar United States 23 464 0.7× 325 0.7× 232 0.6× 281 0.9× 324 1.0× 136 2.0k
Mara Miele United Kingdom 20 678 1.0× 557 1.2× 358 0.9× 376 1.2× 602 1.9× 73 2.2k
Reint Jan Renes Netherlands 19 336 0.5× 468 1.0× 260 0.6× 229 0.7× 285 0.9× 69 1.9k
I.A. van der Lans Netherlands 27 604 0.8× 812 1.7× 301 0.7× 204 0.6× 107 0.3× 84 2.6k
Carl Johan Lagerkvist Sweden 33 956 1.3× 612 1.3× 193 0.5× 131 0.4× 432 1.4× 142 3.4k
Glynn T. Tonsor United States 31 1.0k 1.4× 736 1.6× 161 0.4× 169 0.5× 413 1.3× 144 3.1k
Beth Clark United Kingdom 21 460 0.6× 414 0.9× 93 0.2× 149 0.5× 321 1.0× 50 1.8k
Henry Buller United Kingdom 28 602 0.8× 422 0.9× 469 1.1× 369 1.2× 454 1.4× 90 2.6k
Marije Oostindjer Norway 23 400 0.6× 1.3k 2.8× 178 0.4× 179 0.6× 453 1.4× 37 2.4k
Lewis Holloway United Kingdom 28 1.3k 1.8× 763 1.6× 314 0.8× 348 1.1× 170 0.5× 63 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Jesper Lassen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jesper Lassen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jesper Lassen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jesper Lassen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jesper Lassen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jesper Lassen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jesper Lassen. The network helps show where Jesper Lassen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jesper Lassen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jesper Lassen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jesper Lassen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jesper Lassen. Jesper Lassen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ditlevsen, Kia, et al.. (2020). Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of “naturalness”. Public Understanding of Science. 29(3). 289–305. 11 indexed citations
3.
Ditlevsen, Kia, Sigrid Denver, Tove Christensen, & Jesper Lassen. (2019). A taste for locally produced food - Values, opinions and sociodemographic differences among ‘organic’ and ‘conventional’ consumers. Appetite. 147. 104544–104544. 80 indexed citations
4.
Lassen, Jesper, et al.. (2019). Welfare evaluation of genetically modified mice - An inventory study of reports to the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 29(1). 45–53. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lassen, Jesper, et al.. (2018). A REVIEW OF LAKE VICTORIA SARDINE PRODUCTS BUSINESS AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC AND REGIONAL TRADE. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management. 5(4). 1 indexed citations
6.
Christiansen, Stine B., Annemarie T. Kristensen, Jesper Lassen, & Peter Sandøe. (2015). Veterinarians’ role in clients’ decision-making regarding seriously ill companion animal patients. Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. 58(1). 30–30. 53 indexed citations
7.
Sandøe, Peter, et al.. (2013). Multiple aspects of unnaturalness: are cisgenic crops perceived as being more natural and more acceptable than transgenic crops?. Agriculture and Human Values. 30(3). 471–480. 53 indexed citations
8.
Sandøe, Peter, et al.. (2012). The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies. Public Understanding of Science. 22(2). 155–168. 67 indexed citations
9.
Lund, Thomas Bøker, Peter Sandøe, & Jesper Lassen. (2011). Attitudes to Publicly Funded Obesity Treatment and Prevention. Obesity. 19(8). 1580–1585. 35 indexed citations
10.
Lassen, Jesper, et al.. (2009). Meat in context. On the relation between perceptions and contexts. Appetite. 54(2). 274–281. 51 indexed citations
11.
Nielsen, Annika Porsborg, Jesper Lassen, & Peter Sandøe. (2009). Public participation. Public Understanding of Science. 20(2). 163–178. 11 indexed citations
12.
Houghton, Julie, Gene Rowe, Lynn J. Frewer, et al.. (2007). The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities. Food Policy. 33(1). 13–26. 111 indexed citations
13.
Nielsen, Annika Porsborg, Jesper Lassen, & Peter Sandøe. (2007). Democracy at its Best? The Consensus Conference in a Cross-national Perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 20(1). 13–35. 27 indexed citations
14.
Kleef, Ellen van, Lynn J. Frewer, George Chryssochoidis, et al.. (2006). Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study. Appetite. 47(1). 46–63. 122 indexed citations
15.
Lassen, Jesper, Mickey Gjerris, & Peter Sandøe. (2005). After Dolly—Ethical limits to the use of biotechnology on farm animals. Theriogenology. 65(5). 992–1004. 32 indexed citations
16.
Frewer, Lynn J., Jesper Lassen, B. Kettlitz, et al.. (2004). Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 42(7). 1181–1193. 227 indexed citations
17.
Nielsen, Annika Porsborg, Peter Sandøe, & Jesper Lassen. (2004). Involving the Public—Participatory Methods and Democratic Ideals. 17(1). 1000–1011. 5 indexed citations
18.
Torgersen, Helge, Jürgen Hampel, John Durant, et al.. (2002). Promise, problems and proxies: twenty-five years of debate and regulation in Europe. 30(3). 21–94. 27 indexed citations
19.
Sandøe, Peter, et al.. (2000). Praktisk håndtering af etiske kriterier: hvordan kan forbrugernes etiske krav inddrages i godkendelsesprocedurer. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 51–67. 1 indexed citations
20.
Ivens, Ulla I., et al.. (1998). Injuries among domestic waste collectors. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 33(2). 182–189. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026