Richard Tranter

2.2k total citations
75 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Richard Tranter is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Tranter has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 22 papers in Plant Science and 12 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Richard Tranter's work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (20 papers), Rural development and sustainability (15 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (12 papers). Richard Tranter is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Economics and Policy (20 papers), Rural development and sustainability (15 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (12 papers). Richard Tranter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Ireland. Richard Tranter's co-authors include Philip Jones, Alison Bailey, Chris Garforth, Richard Bennett, T. Rehman, C. M. Yates, Peter Dorward, K. McKemey, Richard J. Cooke and Alan Swinbank and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Energy Policy.

In The Last Decade

Richard Tranter

72 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Tranter United Kingdom 23 418 319 315 303 228 75 1.6k
Helena Hansson Sweden 26 704 1.7× 403 1.3× 265 0.8× 189 0.6× 369 1.6× 116 2.0k
Luiza Toma United Kingdom 23 387 0.9× 389 1.2× 167 0.5× 229 0.8× 310 1.4× 70 1.7k
Ludwig Lauwers Belgium 28 714 1.7× 378 1.2× 351 1.1× 158 0.5× 472 2.1× 130 2.5k
Callum Eastwood New Zealand 19 515 1.2× 460 1.4× 263 0.8× 241 0.8× 243 1.1× 53 1.6k
Philip Jones United Kingdom 23 221 0.5× 405 1.3× 210 0.7× 158 0.5× 308 1.4× 70 1.9k
Gary Schnitkey United States 17 588 1.4× 400 1.3× 368 1.2× 446 1.5× 310 1.4× 241 3.1k
Chris Garforth United Kingdom 18 616 1.5× 401 1.3× 215 0.7× 286 0.9× 141 0.6× 56 2.1k
Nicolas Lampkin United Kingdom 19 533 1.3× 701 2.2× 159 0.5× 184 0.6× 376 1.6× 76 1.7k
M. C. Appleby United Kingdom 9 325 0.8× 365 1.1× 417 1.3× 163 0.5× 475 2.1× 16 1.8k
Michael Morris Trinidad and Tobago 20 289 0.7× 389 1.2× 312 1.0× 438 1.4× 140 0.6× 54 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Tranter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Tranter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Tranter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Tranter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Tranter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Tranter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Tranter. The network helps show where Richard Tranter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Tranter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Tranter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Tranter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Tranter. Richard Tranter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Argyropoulos, Dimitrios, Thomas Engel, Yiorgos Gadanakis, et al.. (2023). Development of a precision agriculture downloadable content for the farming simulator game. CentAUR (University of Reading). 797–804. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jones, Philip, Richard Tranter, Robbie D. Girling, et al.. (2021). Identifying the drivers and constraints to adoption of IPM among arable farmers in the UK and Ireland. Pest Management Science. 77(9). 4148–4158. 36 indexed citations
3.
Niemi, Jarkko K., Richard Bennett, Beth Clark, et al.. (2020). A value chain analysis of interventions to control production diseases in the intensive pig production sector. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0231338–e0231338. 22 indexed citations
4.
Clark, Beth, Luca Panzone, Gavin Stewart, et al.. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems. PLoS ONE. 14(1). e0210432–e0210432. 61 indexed citations
5.
Bennett, Richard, et al.. (2018). The extent that certain dairy farmer attitudes and behaviors are associated with farm business profitability. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(12). 11275–11284. 13 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Philip, Jarkko K. Niemi, Jens Peter Christensen, Richard Tranter, & Richard Bennett. (2018). A review of the financial impact of production diseases in poultry production systems. Animal Production Science. 59(9). 1585–1597. 32 indexed citations
7.
MCFARLANE, I. D., Philip Jones, Julian R. Park, & Richard Tranter. (2018). Identifying GM Crops for Future Cultivation in the EU through a Delphi Forecasting Exercise. CentAUR (University of Reading). 1 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Philip, Jarkko K. Niemi, Richard Tranter, & Richard Bennett. (2017). What are the costs of poultry diseases: a review of nine production diseases. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 1 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Phil, Jarkko K. Niemi, & Richard Tranter. (2017). List of stakeholder preferred interventions. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 1 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Philip, et al.. (2017). Exploring the constraints to further expansion of GM maize production in Portugal. CentAUR (University of Reading). 20(1). 14–23. 1 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Paul D., Jarkko K. Niemi, & Richard Tranter. (2017). Production diseases: the costs to poultry producers. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).
12.
Jones, Philip, Joop Lensink, Maria Cecilia Mancini, & Richard Tranter. (2017). Designing an Institutional Network for Improving Farm Animal Welfare in the EU. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. 55(5). 1081–1093. 5 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Philip & Richard Tranter. (2014). Farmers' interest in growing GM crops in the UK, in the context of a range of on-farm coexistence issues. CentAUR (University of Reading). 17(1). 13–21. 5 indexed citations
14.
Costa‐Font, Montserrat, et al.. (2010). Do defaults matter? Willingness to pay to avoid GM food vis-à-vis organic and conventional food in Denmark, Great Britain and Spain. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
15.
Tranter, Richard, Richard Bennett, Leonardo Costa, et al.. (2009). Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for organic conversion-grade food: Evidence from five EU countries. Food Policy. 34(3). 287–294. 62 indexed citations
17.
Tranter, Richard, et al.. (2006). Living landscapes: hidden costs of managing the countryside. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
18.
Rehman, T., K. McKemey, C. M. Yates, et al.. (2006). Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agricultural Systems. 94(2). 281–293. 125 indexed citations
19.
Daugbjerg, Carsten, Richard Tranter, Philip Jones, et al.. (2005). The visibility of agricultural subsidies and market illusions in the Common Agricultural Policy: Some evidence from farmers’ views in Germany, Portugal and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research. 44(6). 749–766. 9 indexed citations
20.
Bowman, J. C., Chris Doyle, & Richard Tranter. (1978). Why we need a co-ordinated land-use policy.. 46(9). 405–408. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026