Barbara Höhle

3.1k total citations
93 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Barbara Höhle is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara Höhle has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 47 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 28 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Barbara Höhle's work include Language Development and Disorders (56 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (42 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (36 papers). Barbara Höhle is often cited by papers focused on Language Development and Disorders (56 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (42 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (36 papers). Barbara Höhle collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and Australia. Barbara Höhle's co-authors include Jürgen Weißenborn, Thierry Nazzi, Ranka Bijeljac-Babic, Michaela Schmitz, Natalie Boll‐Avetisyan, Anjali Bhatara, Roelien Bastiaanse, Isabell Wartenburger, Anja Müller and Hubert Truckenbrodt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Barbara Höhle

87 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Barbara Höhle Germany 20 1.1k 684 613 180 128 93 1.5k
Reiko Mazuka Japan 21 876 0.8× 653 1.0× 569 0.9× 121 0.7× 128 1.0× 75 1.4k
Nivedita Mani Germany 21 1.4k 1.2× 656 1.0× 788 1.3× 101 0.6× 150 1.2× 81 1.7k
Barbara T. Conboy United States 12 1.2k 1.1× 541 0.8× 630 1.0× 92 0.5× 89 0.7× 22 1.5k
Ferrán Pons Spain 22 1.0k 0.9× 944 1.4× 552 0.9× 62 0.3× 131 1.0× 47 1.5k
Suzanne Curtin Canada 23 1.6k 1.4× 800 1.2× 694 1.1× 68 0.4× 166 1.3× 59 2.0k
Caroline Floccia United Kingdom 25 1.3k 1.1× 1.0k 1.5× 570 0.9× 182 1.0× 150 1.2× 58 1.9k
Christine L. Stager Canada 8 1.5k 1.4× 769 1.1× 359 0.6× 54 0.3× 93 0.7× 15 1.7k
Ranka Bijeljac-Babic France 17 1.4k 1.2× 640 0.9× 693 1.1× 72 0.4× 172 1.3× 27 1.6k
P. W. Jusczyk United States 4 1.4k 1.3× 874 1.3× 345 0.6× 96 0.5× 261 2.0× 6 1.6k
Karen Mattock Australia 16 632 0.6× 680 1.0× 361 0.6× 53 0.3× 73 0.6× 35 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Höhle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Höhle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Höhle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Höhle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Höhle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Höhle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Höhle. The network helps show where Barbara Höhle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Höhle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Höhle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Höhle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Höhle. Barbara Höhle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Veríssimo, João, et al.. (2021). Children’s Learning of Non-adjacent Dependencies Using a Web-Based Computer Game Setting. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 734877–734877. 1 indexed citations
3.
Paul, Mariella, Claudia Männel, Jutta L. Mueller, et al.. (2021). Gradual development of non-adjacent dependency learning during early childhood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 50. 100975–100975. 7 indexed citations
4.
Höhle, Barbara, et al.. (2020). Only the right noise? Effects of phonetic and visual input variability on 14‐month‐olds' minimal pair word learning. Developmental Science. 23(5). e12950–e12950. 19 indexed citations
5.
Boll‐Avetisyan, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Language-specific prosodic acquisition: A comparison of phrase boundary perception by French- and German-learning infants. Journal of Memory and Language. 112. 104108–104108. 10 indexed citations
6.
Boll‐Avetisyan, Natalie, Anjali Bhatara, & Barbara Höhle. (2020). Processing of Rhythm in Speech and Music in Adult Dyslexia. Brain Sciences. 10(5). 261–261. 18 indexed citations
7.
Boll‐Avetisyan, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Rhythmic grouping biases in simultaneous bilinguals. Bilingualism Language and Cognition. 23(5). 1070–1081. 6 indexed citations
8.
Garcia, Rowena, et al.. (2019). Children's online use of word order and morphosyntactic markers in Tagalog thematic role assignment: an eye-tracking study. Journal of Child Language. 47(3). 533–555. 9 indexed citations
9.
Garcia, Rowena, et al.. (2018). Word order preferences of Tagalog-speaking adults and children. First Language. 38(6). 617–640. 11 indexed citations
10.
Garcia, Rowena, et al.. (2018). Thematic role assignment in the L1 acquisition of Tagalog: Use of word order and morphosyntactic markers. Language Acquisition. 26(3). 235–261. 10 indexed citations
11.
Crain, Stephen, et al.. (2018). Understanding Prosodic Focus Marking in Mandarin Chinese: Data from Children and Adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 48(1). 19–32. 7 indexed citations
12.
Bavin, Edith L., Letitia Naigles, Virginia Valian, et al.. (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 35 indexed citations
13.
Boll‐Avetisyan, Natalie, et al.. (2015). Effects of experience with L2 and music on rhythmic grouping by French listeners. Bilingualism Language and Cognition. 19(5). 971–986. 24 indexed citations
14.
Fritzsche, Tom & Barbara Höhle. (2015). Phonological and lexical mismatch detection in 30-month-olds and adults measured by pupillometry.. ICPhS. 3 indexed citations
15.
Höhle, Barbara, et al.. (2011). Ausagieren von Sätzen versus Satz-Bild-Zuordnung : Vergleich zweier Methoden zur Untersuchung des Sprachverständnisses anhand von semantisch reversiblen Sätzen mit Objektvoranstellung bei drei- und fünfjährigen Kindern. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 1 indexed citations
16.
Müller, Anja, et al.. (2007). German 4-year-olds comprehension of sentences containing the focus particle "auch" (also) : evidence from eye- tracking. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 2 indexed citations
17.
Höhle, Barbara, et al.. (2006). Processing of morphological markers as a cue to syntactic phrases by 10-month-olds German-learning infants. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 2 indexed citations
18.
Schmitz, Michaela, Barbara Höhle, Anja Müller, & Jürgen Weißenborn. (2006). The Recognition of the Prosodic Focus Position in German-learning Infants from 4 to 14 Months *. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 92(672). 389–90. 2 indexed citations
19.
Höhle, Barbara, et al.. (2000). The origins of syntactic knowledge : recognition of determiners in one old German children. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 6 indexed citations
20.
Höhle, Barbara & Jürgen Weißenborn. (1998). Sensitivity to closed-class-elements in preverbal children. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026