Arlete Mendes‐Faia
- Food Science top 0.2%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ana Mendes‐FerreiraCatarina BarbosaCecı́lia LeãoVirgílio FalcoAlice VilelaM. Cristina ClímacoDorit Elisabeth SchullerManuela Côrte‐Real
- Topics
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (51 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (38 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers)
In The Last Decade
Arlete Mendes‐Faia
56 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Food Science 1.7k
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 517
- Biochemistry 446
- Biotechnology 249
Countries citing papers authored by Arlete Mendes‐Faia
This map shows the geographic impact of Arlete Mendes‐Faia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arlete Mendes‐Faia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arlete Mendes‐Faia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arlete Mendes‐Faia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arlete Mendes‐Faia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arlete Mendes‐Faia. The network helps show where Arlete Mendes‐Faia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arlete Mendes‐Faia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arlete Mendes‐Faia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arlete Mendes‐Faia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arlete Mendes‐Faia. Arlete Mendes‐Faia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 56 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | Redução da acidez volátil de vinhos por células de Saccharomyces cerevisiae imobilizadas em esferas de alginato-quitosano | 3 |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | The impact of nitrogen on yeast fermentation and wine quality | 34 |
| 9 | GC-olfactometry and descriptive sensory analysis in the study of clonal red wines | 1 |
| 10 | 89 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 86 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 67 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | A method to analyse bound aroma compounds in non-aromatic red grape juices | 4 |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | 91 |
About Arlete Mendes‐Faia
Arlete Mendes‐Faia is a scholar working on Food Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and Biochemistry, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (51 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (38 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (188 citations), Food Science (1.7k citations) and Biochemistry (446 citations). Arlete Mendes‐Faia has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ana Mendes‐Ferreira, Catarina Barbosa, Cecı́lia Leão, Virgílio Falco, Alice Vilela, M. Cristina Clímaco, Dorit Elisabeth Schuller, Manuela Côrte‐Real, Letı́cia M. Estevinho and Ana Paula Pereira. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.