Annie Pye

3.3k total citations
48 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Annie Pye is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Accounting and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Annie Pye has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 13 papers in Accounting and 8 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Annie Pye's work include Management and Organizational Studies (20 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (7 papers). Annie Pye is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (20 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (7 papers). Annie Pye collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cyprus and Ireland. Annie Pye's co-authors include Ian Colville, Andrew D. Brown, Andrew Pettigrew, Szymon Kaczmarek, Satomi Kimino, Louise Knight, Paul Bate, Raza Ali Khan, Iracema Leroi and Piers Dawes and has published in prestigious journals such as Organization Science, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Annie Pye

48 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annie Pye United Kingdom 26 836 627 509 358 191 48 2.1k
Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy United Kingdom 23 489 0.6× 241 0.4× 424 0.8× 409 1.1× 96 0.5× 51 2.2k
Will Felps Australia 15 1.2k 1.4× 881 1.4× 238 0.5× 808 2.3× 152 0.8× 27 3.2k
Frank A. Bosco United States 17 926 1.1× 319 0.5× 180 0.4× 529 1.5× 134 0.7× 33 2.3k
Lamar Pierce United States 30 529 0.6× 635 1.0× 406 0.8× 836 2.3× 95 0.5× 71 3.0k
Ingrid Smithey Fulmer United States 20 970 1.2× 485 0.8× 376 0.7× 588 1.6× 153 0.8× 38 2.2k
K. Galen Kroeck United States 12 1.5k 1.8× 741 1.2× 213 0.4× 356 1.0× 258 1.4× 20 2.6k
Roy D. Howell United States 26 807 1.0× 452 0.7× 208 0.4× 715 2.0× 83 0.4× 55 3.0k
John Cunningham Canada 23 882 1.1× 413 0.7× 522 1.0× 815 2.3× 47 0.2× 85 2.8k
Tiziana Casciaro Canada 16 714 0.9× 1.0k 1.6× 319 0.6× 793 2.2× 111 0.6× 35 2.8k
William D. Spangler United States 17 1.5k 1.8× 684 1.1× 174 0.3× 439 1.2× 134 0.7× 27 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Annie Pye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annie Pye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annie Pye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annie Pye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annie Pye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annie Pye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annie Pye. The network helps show where Annie Pye may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annie Pye

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annie Pye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annie Pye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annie Pye. Annie Pye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dawes, Piers, David Reeves, Wai Kent Yeung, et al.. (2023). Development and validation of the Montreal cognitive assessment for people with hearing impairment ( MoCA‐H ). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 71(5). 1485–1494. 20 indexed citations
2.
Dawes, Piers, Annie Pye, David Reeves, et al.. (2019). Protocol for the development of versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for people with hearing or vision impairment. BMJ Open. 9(3). e026246–e026246. 38 indexed citations
3.
Charalambous, Anna Pavlina, Annie Pye, Wai Kent Yeung, et al.. (2019). Tools for App- and Web-Based Self-Testing of Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Search and Evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(1). e14551–e14551. 40 indexed citations
4.
Yeung, Wai Kent, Piers Dawes, Annie Pye, et al.. (2019). Author Correction: eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. npj Digital Medicine. 2(1). 117–117. 5 indexed citations
5.
Yeung, Wai Kent, Piers Dawes, Annie Pye, et al.. (2019). eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. npj Digital Medicine. 2(1). 82–82. 34 indexed citations
6.
Leroi, Iracema, Annie Pye, Christopher J. Armitage, et al.. (2017). Research protocol for a complex intervention to support hearing and vision function to improve the lives of people with dementia. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 3(1). 38–38. 11 indexed citations
7.
Pye, Annie, et al.. (2017). Screening tools for the identification of dementia for adults with age-related acquired hearing or vision impairment: a scoping review. International Psychogeriatrics. 29(11). 1771–1784. 48 indexed citations
8.
Dawes, Piers, Annie Pye, Christopher J. Armitage, et al.. (2017). Improving hearing and vision in dementia: protocol for a field trial of a new intervention. BMJ Open. 7(11). e018744–e018744. 16 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Andrew D., Ian Colville, & Annie Pye. (2017). Storytelling, Mindfulness and High-Reliability Organizing. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 15235–15235. 2 indexed citations
10.
Hawkins, Beverley, et al.. (2016). Boundary objects, power, and learning: The matter of developing sustainable practice in organizations. Management Learning. 48(3). 292–310. 32 indexed citations
11.
Pye, Annie & Patricia E.G. Bestelmeyer. (2014). Evidence for a supra-modal representation of emotion from cross-modal adaptation. Cognition. 134. 245–251. 24 indexed citations
12.
Pye, Annie & Andrew Pettigrew. (2005). Studying Board Context, Process and Dynamics: Some Challenges for the Future. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
13.
Knight, Louise & Annie Pye. (2005). Network learning: An empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations. Human Relations. 58(3). 369–392. 99 indexed citations
14.
Pye, Annie. (2005). Leadership and Organizing: Sensemaking in Action. Leadership. 1(1). 31–49. 138 indexed citations
15.
Pye, Annie. (2003). The Changing Power of 'Explanations': Directors, Academics and Their Sensemaking from 1989 to 2000. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bate, Paul, Raza Ali Khan, & Annie Pye. (2000). Culturally sensitive structuring: An action research-based approach to organization development and design. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 23(4). 445. 9 indexed citations
17.
Bate, Paul, Raza Ali Khan, & Annie Pye. (2000). Towards A Culturally Sensitive Approach To Organization Structuring: Where Organization Design Meets Organization Development. Organization Science. 11(2). 197–211. 88 indexed citations
18.
Pye, Annie. (1995). Strategy through Dialogue and Doing. Management Learning. 26(4). 445–462. 27 indexed citations
19.
Pye, Annie. (1994). Walking and talking chester I. Barnard. International Journal of Public Administration. 17(6). 1125–1156. 7 indexed citations
20.
Pye, Annie. (1993). "Organizing as Explaining" and the Doing of Managing. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2(2). 157–168. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026