Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management16.5k
Strategy and Management7.9k
Education7.1k
Sociology and Political Science6.3k
Management of Technology and Innovation5.4k
Replace Journal of Organizational Change Management with:
Journal of Organizational Change ManagementUnited States
OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Leadership & Organization Development JournalUnited States
International Journal of ManpowerUnited Kingdom
Human Resource Development QuarterlyUnited States
The Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceUnited States
International Journal of Educational ManagementUnited States
Human Resource Management JournalUnited Kingdom
Journal of Management InquiryUnited States
Public Management ReviewUnited States
Journal of Organizational Change ManagementUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Management Learning
Management Learning · 1×
×1.219.2kOBHRM
×1.512.0kSM
×0.43.2kEDUCA
×1.27.8kSPS
×0.94.8kMTI
Citations per year, relative to Management Learning
Management Learning · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Management Learning
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Management Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Management Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Management Learning more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Management Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Management Learning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.