Anne Meier

515 total citations
9 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

Anne Meier is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Meier has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Computer Science Applications and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Anne Meier's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). Anne Meier is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). Anne Meier collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Greece and Spain. Anne Meier's co-authors include Hans Spada, Nikol Rummel, T. P. Hutchinson, Nikolaos Avouris, Frank Fischer, Erin Walker, José Antonio Marcos, Andreas Harrer, Armin Weinberger and Alejandra Martínez‐Monés and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) and eScholarship (California Digital Library).

In The Last Decade

Anne Meier

9 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anne Meier Germany	6	236	96	84	56	55	9	320
Mirweis Sangin Switzerland	11	210 0.9×	103 1.1×	41 0.5×	67 1.2×	47 0.9×	21	311
Jennifer K. Olsen Switzerland	12	185 0.8×	89 0.9×	122 1.5×	19 0.3×	96 1.7×	35	374
Dimitra Tsovaltzi Germany	10	148 0.6×	112 1.2×	40 0.5×	48 0.9×	107 1.9×	33	307
Héctor J. Pijeira‐Díaz Netherlands	9	197 0.8×	154 1.6×	156 1.9×	20 0.4×	67 1.2×	15	406
Klaus Schwienhorst Ireland	12	209 0.9×	163 1.7×	30 0.4×	29 0.5×	36 0.7×	17	544
Jessica Andrews‐Todd United States	8	251 1.1×	150 1.6×	88 1.0×	21 0.4×	74 1.3×	17	423
Cornelia Schoor Germany	9	260 1.1×	182 1.9×	82 1.0×	36 0.6×	50 0.9×	23	388
Carol Forsyth United States	10	239 1.0×	102 1.1×	99 1.2×	16 0.3×	147 2.7×	21	388
Soniya Gadgil United States	6	226 1.0×	201 2.1×	40 0.5×	22 0.4×	52 0.9×	12	386
Meghann Fior Canada	5	169 0.7×	123 1.3×	75 0.9×	37 0.7×	78 1.4×	6	335

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Meier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Meier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Meier. The network helps show where Anne Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Meier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Meier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Meier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Meier. Anne Meier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Meier, Anne, et al.. (2008). Rating the quality of collaboration during networked problem solving activities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning. 6. 409–416. 2 indexed citations

Meier, Anne & Hans Spada. (2008). Promoting the drawing of inferences in collaboration: insights from two experimental studies. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 67–74. 1 indexed citations

Rummel, Nikol, Armin Weinberger, Christof Wecker, et al.. (2008). New challenges in CSCL: towards adaptive script support. 338–345. 23 indexed citations

Meier, Anne, Hans Spada, & Nikol Rummel. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2(1). 63–86. 219 indexed citations

Harrer, Andreas, Nikolaos Avouris, José Antonio Marcos, et al.. (2007). Towards a flexible model for computer-based analysis and visualization of collaborative learning activities. Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference. 283–285. 6 indexed citations

Meier, Anne, et al.. (2006). Expertise Development in Clinical Psychology. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28). 4 indexed citations

Spada, Hans, et al.. (2005). A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. 622–631. 34 indexed citations

Spada, Hans, et al.. (2005). A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL. 622–631. 25 indexed citations

Hutchinson, T. P. & Anne Meier. (2004). Evidence-based road safety policy? Evidence-based transport policy? A discussion of randomised experimentation and meta-analysis in the evaluation of interventions. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 27. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact