Anika Dreher
- Education top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Sebastian KuntzeAnke LindmeierAiso HeinzeStephen LermanFeng-Jui HsiehTimo LeudersJessica HothBärbel Barzel
- Topics
- Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (14 papers)Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyTaiwanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anika Dreher
16 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Education 290
- Statistics and Probability 96
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 65
- Applied Mathematics 42
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Anika Dreher
This map shows the geographic impact of Anika Dreher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anika Dreher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anika Dreher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anika Dreher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anika Dreher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anika Dreher. The network helps show where Anika Dreher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anika Dreher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anika Dreher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anika Dreher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anika Dreher. Anika Dreher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Online professional development for teaching algebra: Towards the design of an asynchronous, adaptive self-learning module | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | Dealing with multiple representations in the mathematics classroom - Teachers' knowledge, views, and their noticing | 2 |
| 14 | Empirical Study of a Competence Structure Model Regarding Conversions of Representations -- The Case of Fractions. | 1 |
| 15 | 116 | |
| 16 | 17 |
About Anika Dreher
Anika Dreher is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Education and Information Systems and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (14 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (96 citations), Education (290 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (65 citations). Anika Dreher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Taiwan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Kuntze, Anke Lindmeier, Aiso Heinze, Stephen Lerman, Feng-Jui Hsieh, Timo Leuders, Jessica Hoth, Bärbel Barzel and Andreas Obersteiner. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Psychology, Educational Studies in Mathematics and ZDM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.