Countries citing papers authored by William S. Carlsen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Carlsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Carlsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Carlsen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Carlsen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Carlsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Carlsen. The network helps show where William S. Carlsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Carlsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Carlsen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Carlsen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Carlsen. William S. Carlsen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carlsen, William S.. (2015). Closing down the Conversation: Discouraging Student Talk on Unfamilar Science Content.. The Journal of classroom interaction. 50(1). 73–84.2 indexed citations
3.
Carlsen, William S., et al.. (2010). Online science classroom collaborations: a comparison of domestic and international learning communities. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 350–351.1 indexed citations
4.
Cunningham, Christine M., Meredith Knight, William S. Carlsen, & Gregory J. Kelly. (2007). Integrating engineering in middle and high school classrooms. International journal of engineering education. 23(1). 3–8.41 indexed citations
Trautmann, Nancy M., William S. Carlsen, Charles J. Eick, et al.. (2003). Online Peer Review: Learning Science as It's Practiced. The journal of college science teaching. 32(7).8 indexed citations
7.
Krasny, Marianne E., et al.. (2003). Invasion Ecology. Student Edition. Cornell Scientific Inquiry Series..2 indexed citations
8.
Trautmann, Nancy M., William S. Carlsen, Charles J. Eick, et al.. (2003). Online Peer Review. Journal of College Science Teaching. 32(7).9 indexed citations
9.
Single, Peg Boyle, Carol B. Muller, Christine M. Cunningham, Richard M. Single, & William S. Carlsen. (2002). A three year analysis of the benefits accrued by women engineering and science students Who participated in a large-scale E-mentoring program. 5015–5026.1 indexed citations
Carlsen, William S.. (1997). Never ask a question if you don't know the answer: The tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order.. The Journal of classroom interaction.26 indexed citations
Carlsen, William S. & David H. Monk. (1992). Differences between Rural and Nonrural Secondary Science Teachers: Evidence from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth.. Journal of Research in Rural Education. 8(2). 1–10.11 indexed citations
Carlsen, William S.. (1988). The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. UMI eBooks.15 indexed citations
19.
Carlsen, William S. & Suzanne M. Wilson. (1988). Responding to Student Questions: The Effects of Teacher Subject-Matter Knowledge and Experience on Teacher Discourse Strategies..2 indexed citations
20.
Carlsen, William S., et al.. (1981). Small Rural Schools: A Portrait.. The High School journal. 64(7). 299–309.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.