Vicki Langendyk
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Education top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Family Practice top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wendy HuBrahmaputra MarjadiKenneth ChoIan WilsonShaoyu WangRoslyn WeaverIman HegaziLeanne Cowin
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers)Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Vicki Langendyk
10 papers receiving 439 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 240
- Education 149
- General Health Professions 95
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 82
- Family Practice 64
Countries citing papers authored by Vicki Langendyk
This map shows the geographic impact of Vicki Langendyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vicki Langendyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vicki Langendyk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vicki Langendyk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vicki Langendyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vicki Langendyk. The network helps show where Vicki Langendyk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vicki Langendyk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vicki Langendyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vicki Langendyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vicki Langendyk. Vicki Langendyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 88 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 'The game is in the tutorial' : an evaluation of the use of an e-portfolio for personal and professional development in a medical school | 1 |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | The introduction of an online portfolio system in a medical school: what can activity theory tell us? | 1 |
| 10 | 137 | |
| 11 | 29 |
About Vicki Langendyk
Vicki Langendyk is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Health Information Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (64 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations) and Leadership and Management (11 citations). Vicki Langendyk has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Hu, Brahmaputra Marjadi, Kenneth Cho, Ian Wilson, Shaoyu Wang, Roslyn Weaver, Iman Hegazi, Leanne Cowin, Maree Johnson and P. Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education and The Medical Journal of Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.