Jane Latimer

13.0k total citations
190 papers, 9.3k citations indexed

About

Jane Latimer is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Latimer has authored 190 papers receiving a total of 9.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 128 papers in Pharmacology, 63 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 38 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Latimer's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (128 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (63 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (28 papers). Jane Latimer is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (128 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (63 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (28 papers). Jane Latimer collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Latimer's co-authors include Christopher G. Maher, Manuela L. Ferreira, Paulo H. Ferreira, James H. McAuley, Kathryn M. Refshauge, Mark J. Hancock, Rob Herbert, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Amanda Häll and Tasha R. Stanton and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.

In The Last Decade

Jane Latimer

188 papers receiving 8.9k citations

Peers

Jane Latimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Pharmacology 6.4k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
  • Surgery 1.4k
  • Cell Biology 1.3k
Replace Manuela L. Ferreira with:
Manuela L. Ferreira Australia
Paulo H. Ferreira Australia
Steven J. Kamper Australia
Jan Hartvigsen Denmark
Charlotte Leboeuf‐Yde Denmark
Mark J. Hancock Australia
Paul M. Peloso United States
Antti Malmivaara Finland
James H. McAuley Australia
Chung‐Wei Christine Lin Australia
Manuela L. Ferreira Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jane Latimer
Jane Latimer · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jane Latimer
Jane Latimer · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Latimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Latimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Latimer. The network helps show where Jane Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Latimer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Latimer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Latimer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Latimer. Jane Latimer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 2
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 2
7 12
8
Growth faltering in children of the Kimberley: Effects of alcohol restriction
3
9 13
10 27
11 8
12 19
13 53
14 25
15 117
16 52
17 425
18 73
19 281
20 62

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026