The Medical Journal of Australia

27.5k papers and 375.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 27.5k papers published in The Medical Journal of Australia in the last decades have received a total of 375.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Medical Journal of Australia usually cover Surgery (3.8k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.6k papers) and General Health Professions (3.4k papers) specifically the topics of Global Health Workforce Issues (1.1k papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (931 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (455 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Medical Journal of Australia are Jeff Szer, Bruce Ford, Drew Richardson, Ian B. Hickie, Anthony F. Jorm, Helen Christensen, Harold A. Harper, Struan K. Sutherland, Rinaldo Bellomo and John Pearn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Medical Journal of Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Medical Journal of Australia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Medical Journal of Australia.

Countries where authors publish in The Medical Journal of Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Medical Journal of Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Medical Journal of Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Medical Journal of Australia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026