Scott K. Stolte
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Melissa S. MedinaAmy L. PittengerCecilia M. PlazaDebra CopelandQuamrun N. MasudaSusan M. MillerMatthew LacroixBrenda L. Gleason
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers)Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers)Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Geriatrics and GerontologyFamily PracticePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- Annals of PharmacotherapyAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical EducationCurrents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Scott K. Stolte
16 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 378
- General Health Professions 238
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 227
- Education 150
- Social Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Scott K. Stolte
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott K. Stolte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott K. Stolte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott K. Stolte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott K. Stolte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott K. Stolte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott K. Stolte. The network helps show where Scott K. Stolte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott K. Stolte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott K. Stolte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott K. Stolte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott K. Stolte. Scott K. Stolte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 212 | |
| 5 | 79 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 83 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | TECHNOLOGY IN PHARMACY EDUCATION Student Pharmacists' Use and Perceived Impact of Educational Technologies | 1 |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 |
About Scott K. Stolte
Scott K. Stolte is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 16 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (227 citations), Family Practice (37 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (378 citations). Scott K. Stolte has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Melissa S. Medina, Amy L. Pittenger, Cecilia M. Plaza, Debra Copeland, Quamrun N. Masuda, Susan M. Miller, Matthew Lacroix, Brenda L. Gleason, Stuart T. Haines and Marianne McCollum. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Pharmacotherapy, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.