Christopher G. Maher
- Pharmacology top 0.01%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.01%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.05%
- Surgery top 0.2%
- Cell Biology top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Rob HerbertAnne M. MoseleyJane LatimerCatherine SherringtonJames H. McAuleyMark J. HancockKathryn M. RefshaugeMark R. Elkins
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (529 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (212 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (144 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Christopher G. Maher
689 papers receiving 40.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Pharmacology 27.8k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 11.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 7.4k
- Surgery 6.7k
- Cell Biology 4.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher G. Maher
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher G. Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher G. Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher G. Maher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher G. Maher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher G. Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher G. Maher. The network helps show where Christopher G. Maher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher G. Maher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher G. Maher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher G. Maher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher G. Maher. Christopher G. Maher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | “To the Editor of the Journal of Pain Research” [Letter] | 1 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 78 |
About Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Occupational Therapy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 722 papers that have together received 42.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (529 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (212 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (144 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (27.8k citations), Occupational Therapy (2.8k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (11.0k citations). Christopher G. Maher has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Rob Herbert, Anne M. Moseley, Jane Latimer, Catherine Sherrington, James H. McAuley, Mark J. Hancock, Kathryn M. Refshauge, Mark R. Elkins, Manuela L. Ferreira and Steven J. Kamper. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.