Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression
2018680 citationsAmandeep Dhir, Puneet Kaur et al.profile →
Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue
2019198 citationsAmandeep Dhir, Puneet Kaur et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Sufen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sufen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sufen Chen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sufen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sufen Chen. The network helps show where Sufen Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sufen Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sufen Chen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sufen Chen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sufen Chen. Sufen Chen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lai, Chih‐Hung, et al.. (2014). The Association between College Students' Internet Usage and Interpersonal Relationships. 網際網路技術學刊. 15(4). 671–678.1 indexed citations
Qi, Xiaobo, et al.. (2010). Effects of furnace atmosphere pressure on fabrication process of hollow glass microspheres in drop-tower furnace. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology).2 indexed citations
15.
Qi, Xiaobo, et al.. (2010). Transformation Process From Dried-Gel Particle to Hollow Glass Microsphere in Drop-Tower Furnace by Sol-Gel Technology. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 44(11). 1371–1375.2 indexed citations
16.
Gu, Zhonghua, Laitao Luo, & Sufen Chen. (2009). Effect of calcination temperature of TiO 2 -Al 2 O 3 mixed oxides on hydrodesulphurization performance of Au-Pd catalysts. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 16(2). 175–180.4 indexed citations
17.
Chen, Sufen, et al.. (2009). Influence of preparation method on the performance of Pd/ ZrO 2 -Al 2 O 3 catalysts for HDS. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 16(3). 272–277.5 indexed citations
18.
Liang, Ling L., et al.. (2008). Assessing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Views on the Nature of Scientific Knowledge: A Dual-Response Instrument.. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 9(1).69 indexed citations
19.
Chen, Sufen. (2006). Views on Science and Education (VOSE) Questionnaire.. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 7(2).13 indexed citations
20.
Chen, Sufen. (2001). Prospective teachers' views on the nature of science and science teaching. PhDT.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.