Computational Mechanics

1.6M papers and 29.4M indexed citations

About

1.6M papers covering Computational Mechanics have received a total of 29.4M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics and Combustion and flame dynamics and also cover the fields of Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering. Some of the most active scholars covering Computational Mechanics are David L. Donoho, Emmanuel J. Candès, Stanley Osher, Chi‐Wang Shu, Florian Menter, S. Haykin, Thomas J.R. Hughes, Parviz Moin, Shiing-Shen Chern and J. J. Monaghan.

In The Last Decade

Computational Mechanics

238.2k papers receiving 2.1M citations

Countries where authors publish papers about Computational Mechanics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Computational Mechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Computational Mechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computational Mechanics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers about Computational Mechanics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Computational Mechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Computational Mechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026