Stacy Blake‐Beard

1.7k total citations
26 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Stacy Blake‐Beard is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacy Blake‐Beard has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Social Psychology, 13 papers in Gender Studies and 12 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Stacy Blake‐Beard's work include Mentoring and Academic Development (13 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (12 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (11 papers). Stacy Blake‐Beard is often cited by papers focused on Mentoring and Academic Development (13 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (12 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (11 papers). Stacy Blake‐Beard collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Bangladesh. Stacy Blake‐Beard's co-authors include Faye J. Crosby, Shivganesh Bhargava, Sumita Datta, Upasna A. Agarwal, Carol B. Muller, Cynthia Ingols, Mary Shapiro, Regina M. O’Neill, Audrey J. Murrell and Laura Morgan Roberts and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Social Issues.

In The Last Decade

Stacy Blake‐Beard

26 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacy Blake‐Beard United States 13 494 358 319 274 241 26 1.1k
Suzanne C. de Janasz United States 10 462 0.9× 346 1.0× 383 1.2× 110 0.4× 101 0.4× 18 1.0k
Rajashi Ghosh United States 19 633 1.3× 621 1.7× 307 1.0× 198 0.7× 104 0.4× 61 1.5k
Jennifer M. Kidd United Kingdom 15 331 0.7× 445 1.2× 412 1.3× 92 0.3× 278 1.2× 42 1.1k
Hong Deng United Kingdom 18 479 1.0× 624 1.7× 176 0.6× 92 0.3× 191 0.8× 35 1.2k
Dawn E. Chandler United States 9 410 0.8× 579 1.6× 430 1.3× 111 0.4× 192 0.8× 12 1.4k
Marco S. DiRenzo United States 16 370 0.7× 701 2.0× 196 0.6× 181 0.7× 86 0.4× 23 1.1k
Carol A. McKeen Canada 18 533 1.1× 292 0.8× 334 1.0× 370 1.4× 103 0.4× 44 1.0k
Sarbari Bordia Australia 14 261 0.5× 445 1.2× 177 0.6× 79 0.3× 129 0.5× 35 958
Jeffrey Yip United States 12 287 0.6× 311 0.9× 233 0.7× 83 0.3× 118 0.5× 28 698
Gerard A. Callanan United States 16 204 0.4× 329 0.9× 406 1.3× 76 0.3× 203 0.8× 25 966

Countries citing papers authored by Stacy Blake‐Beard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy Blake‐Beard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy Blake‐Beard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy Blake‐Beard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy Blake‐Beard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy Blake‐Beard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy Blake‐Beard. The network helps show where Stacy Blake‐Beard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy Blake‐Beard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy Blake‐Beard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy Blake‐Beard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy Blake‐Beard. Stacy Blake‐Beard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shapiro, Mary, et al.. (2022). What's Power Got to Do with It? Seeking Gender-Equity in Organizations through Male Ally Initiatives. 41(1). 1–12. 5 indexed citations
2.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, et al.. (2022). Women’s ways of mentoring: Peer group mentorship as a meaningful developmental experience. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning. 30(5). 634–653. 2 indexed citations
3.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, Mary Shapiro, & Cynthia Ingols. (2021). A Model for Strengthening Mentors: Frames and Practices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(12). 6465–6465. 8 indexed citations
4.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, et al.. (2020). An exploration of the peer group mentoring experiences of university female basketball athletes. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning. 28(2). 229–252. 6 indexed citations
5.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, Mary Shapiro, & Cynthia Ingols. (2020). Feminine? Masculine? Androgynous leadership as a necessity in COVID-19. Gender in Management An International Journal. 35(7/8). 607–617. 27 indexed citations
6.
O’Neill, Regina M., Mary Shapiro, Cynthia Ingols, & Stacy Blake‐Beard. (2017). Understanding Women's Career Goals across Ethnic Identities. 33. 196–214. 1 indexed citations
7.
Maher, Jill K., et al.. (2015). She’s already busy. Gender in Management An International Journal. 30(4). 286–311. 10 indexed citations
8.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, et al.. (2012). What Good is Bad Mentorship? Protégé's Perception of Negative Mentoring Experiences. Indian journal of industrial relations. 48(1). 79–93. 9 indexed citations
9.
Agarwal, Upasna A., Sumita Datta, Stacy Blake‐Beard, & Shivganesh Bhargava. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions. Career Development International. 17(3). 208–230. 296 indexed citations
10.
Muller, Carol B., et al.. (2012). LEARNING FROM THE EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN OF COLOR IN MENTORNET'S ONE-ON-ONE PROGRAM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 18(4). 315–335. 11 indexed citations
11.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, et al.. (2011). Matching by Race and Gender in Mentoring Relationships: Keeping our Eyes on the Prize. Journal of Social Issues. 67(3). 622–643. 257 indexed citations
12.
Shapiro, Mary, Cynthia Ingols, & Stacy Blake‐Beard. (2011). Using Power to Influence Outcomes. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 35(5). 713–748. 5 indexed citations
13.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy, Regina M. O’Neill, Cynthia Ingols, & Mary Shapiro. (2010). Social sustainability, flexible work arrangements, and diverse women. Gender in Management An International Journal. 25(5). 408–425. 27 indexed citations
14.
Roberts, Laura Morgan, et al.. (2008). The Invisible Work of Managing Visibility for Social Change. Business & Society. 47(4). 425–456. 10 indexed citations
15.
Murrell, Audrey J., et al.. (2008). Interorganizational formal mentoring: Breaking the concrete ceiling sometimes requires support from the outside. Human Resource Management. 47(2). 275–294. 37 indexed citations
16.
Shapiro, Mary, Cynthia Ingols, & Stacy Blake‐Beard. (2008). Confronting Career Double Binds. Journal of Career Development. 34(3). 309–333. 40 indexed citations
17.
Crosby, Faye J., et al.. (2005). The Perceived Importance of Developmental Relationships on Women Undergraduates' Pursuit of Science. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 29(4). 419–426. 57 indexed citations
18.
O’Neill, Regina M. & Stacy Blake‐Beard. (2002). Gender Barriers to the Female Mentor – Male Protégé Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics. 37(1). 51–63. 39 indexed citations
19.
Blake‐Beard, Stacy. (2001). Taking a hard look at formal mentoring programs. Journal of Management Development. 20(4). 331–345. 106 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026