Ruth Boelens
- Education top 2%
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Bram De WeverMichiel VoetJan ElenStijn Van LaerYves RosseelAlain VerstraeteAnselme DereseSusan McKenney
- Topics
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers)Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers)Online and Blended Learning (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ruth Boelens
7 papers receiving 650 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Education 537
- Computer Science Applications 185
- Information Systems 141
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 136
- Sociology and Political Science 43
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Boelens
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Boelens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Boelens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Boelens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Boelens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Boelens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Boelens. The network helps show where Ruth Boelens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Boelens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Boelens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Boelens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Boelens. Ruth Boelens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | Vier didactische aandachtspunten om blended leren effectief in te zetten | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learningbreakdown → | 193 |
| 5 | Collaborating on a shared document : vocational and technical students’ approaches and experiences | 1 |
| 6 | Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature reviewbreakdown → | 406 |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning | 59 |
About Ruth Boelens
Ruth Boelens is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Computer Science Applications, having authored 9 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (185 citations), Education (537 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (136 citations). Ruth Boelens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bram De Wever, Michiel Voet, Jan Elen, Stijn Van Laer, Yves Rosseel, Alain Verstraete, Anselme Derese and Susan McKenney. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Journal of the Learning Sciences and Educational Research Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.