Michiel Voet

15 papers receiving 877 citations

Hit Papers

Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A ...201720262020202320172018100200300400

Peers

Michiel Voet
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Education 657
  • Computer Science Applications 190
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 190
  • Information Systems 164
  • Sociology and Political Science 142
Replace Anna Espasa with:
Anna Espasa Spain
Ormond Simpson United Kingdom
Maree Gosper Australia
Thomas Howard Morris United Kingdom
Nicole J. Tavares Hong Kong
Deanne Gannaway Australia
Belinda Tynan Australia
Simon Lygo‐Baker United Kingdom
Peter Twining United Kingdom
Daniel Rees Lewis United States
Michiel Voet relative to Anna Espasa Spain Anna Espasa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Anna Espasa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michiel Voet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michiel Voet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michiel Voet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michiel Voet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michiel Voet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michiel Voet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michiel Voet. The network helps show where Michiel Voet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michiel Voet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michiel Voet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michiel Voet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michiel Voet. Michiel Voet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 39
2 10
3 13
4
Vier didactische aandachtspunten om blended leren effectief in te zetten
0
5 0
6
The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learningbreakdown →
193
7 32
8
Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature reviewbreakdown →
406
9 13
10 12
11 26
12 17
13
History teachers' adoption of inquiry-based learning activities : toward a predictive model
1
14 66
15 41
16 41
17 22

About Michiel Voet

Michiel Voet is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (7 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers) and Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (190 citations), Education (657 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (190 citations). Michiel Voet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bram De Wever, Ruth Boelens, Raija Hämäläinen, Ruben Vanderlinde, Thatjana Gardeitchik, Miski Mohamed, Éva Morava, Cláudia Sà dos Reis and Peter Hogg. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Teaching and Teacher Education and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026