Rebecca Luce‐Kapler

34 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers

Rebecca Luce‐Kapler
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Education 479
  • Sociology and Political Science 177
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 148
  • Literature and Literary Theory 128
  • Social Psychology 65
Replace Stefinee Pinnegar with:
Stefinee Pinnegar United States
Miriam Ben‐Peretz Israel
Francesca M. Forzani United States
Andrew Gitlin United States
Clare Kosnik Canada
Inna Semetsky Australia
Margret Buchmann United States
Anthony Clarke Canada
Bob Köster Netherlands
Pertti Kansanen Finland
Rebecca Luce‐Kapler relative to Stefinee Pinnegar United States Stefinee Pinnegar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stefinee Pinnegar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Luce‐Kapler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Luce‐Kapler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Luce‐Kapler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Luce‐Kapler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Luce‐Kapler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Luce‐Kapler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Luce‐Kapler. The network helps show where Rebecca Luce‐Kapler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Luce‐Kapler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Luce‐Kapler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Luce‐Kapler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Luce‐Kapler. Rebecca Luce‐Kapler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Enactment of Applied English: Does Caring Lead to Teaching to the Test?.
1
2 6
3 5
4 13
5 4
6 1
7 11
8 33
9
Collateral Learning, Changing Texts and the Curriculum
2
10
Creative Fragments: The Subjunctive Spaces of E-Literature
1
11 21
12 24
13 17
14 6
15 17
16 6
17 3
18
Harbinger of the Possible: Choice and Diversity in Reading and Writing.
0
19 1
20 1

About Rebecca Luce‐Kapler

Rebecca Luce‐Kapler is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Human Factors and Ergonomics and General Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (6 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (4 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (65 citations), Education (479 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (148 citations). Rebecca Luce‐Kapler has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Dennis Sumara, Brent Davis, Trevor J. Gambell, Don A. Klinger, Angela Pyle, Jennifer Medves, Sonia Gulati, Margo Paterson, Teresa Dobson and Erin O’Donnell. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy and Early Child Development and Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026