Pieter Spooren
- Education top 1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dimitri MortelmansJoke DenekensWim ChristiaensDavid GijbelsVincent DonchePeter BursensPeter Van PetegemGert Vanthournout
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (14 papers)Online and Blended Learning (5 papers)Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Pieter Spooren
24 papers receiving 930 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Education 801
- Social Psychology 185
- Information Systems 77
- Political Science and International Relations 75
- Computer Science Applications 69
Countries citing papers authored by Pieter Spooren
This map shows the geographic impact of Pieter Spooren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pieter Spooren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pieter Spooren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pieter Spooren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pieter Spooren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pieter Spooren. The network helps show where Pieter Spooren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pieter Spooren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pieter Spooren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pieter Spooren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pieter Spooren. Pieter Spooren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | Exploring students' differences of motivation, interest and self-efficacy in a cross-continental simulation context | 1 |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teachingbreakdown → | 434 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | The unbearable lighness of student evaluations of teaching in higher education A series of studies on their use and validity | 2 |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 128 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | Een kwantitatieve analyse van vragenlijsten afgenomen bij 115 holebi's. Verenigingen en welzijnswerk hand in hand? | 0 |
About Pieter Spooren
Pieter Spooren is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Public Administration, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (801 citations), Computer Science Applications (69 citations) and Social Psychology (185 citations). Pieter Spooren has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dimitri Mortelmans, Joke Denekens, Wim Christiaens, David Gijbels, Vincent Donche, Peter Bursens, Peter Van Petegem, Gert Vanthournout, Koen Pepermans and Peter Thijssen. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Educational Research, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.