Philip T. Walmsley
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Paul R. SackettNathan R. KuncelAdam BeattyAmanda J. KochJeffrey M. CucinaNicholas R. MartinJames W. BeckTheodore L. Hayes
- Topics
- Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Leadership QuarterlyPerspectives on Psychological ScienceHuman Resource Management Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip T. Walmsley
16 papers receiving 209 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Clinical Psychology 85
- Social Psychology 69
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 65
- Sociology and Political Science 37
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Walmsley
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Walmsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Walmsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Walmsley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Walmsley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Walmsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Walmsley. The network helps show where Philip T. Walmsley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Walmsley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Walmsley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Walmsley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Walmsley. Philip T. Walmsley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 100 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | A Comparison of Alternate Approaches to Creating Indices of Academic Rigor | 2 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | Job and work analysis: Industrial and Organizational Psychology | 0 |
About Philip T. Walmsley
Philip T. Walmsley is a scholar working on General Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (65 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations) and Clinical Psychology (85 citations). Philip T. Walmsley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Sackett, Nathan R. Kuncel, Adam Beatty, Amanda J. Koch, Jeffrey M. Cucina, Nicholas R. Martin, James W. Beck, Theodore L. Hayes, Jack W. Kostal and Winny Shen. Their work appears in journals such as The Leadership Quarterly, Perspectives on Psychological Science and Human Resource Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.