Perspectives on Psychological Science
About
In The Last Decade
Perspectives on Psychological Science
1.3k papers receiving 131.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Perspectives on Psychological Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Countries where authors publish in Perspectives on Psychological Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Perspectives on Psychological Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Perspectives on Psychological Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perspectives on Psychological Science more than expected).
- Amazon's Mechanical Turk (2011)
- Rethinking Rumination (2008)
- Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality (2015)
- Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013)
- How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action From a Conceptual and Neural Perspective (2011)
- Toward a Psychology of Human Agency (2006)
- The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice (2006)
- Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science (2012)
- Scientific Utopia (2012)
- Beyond Power Calculations (2014)
- Loneliness Across the Life Span (2015)
- Dehumanization in Medicine (2012)
- Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory Revision: Moving Culture From the Macro Into the Micro (2017)
- Homo Ignorans (2016)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.