Philip Bobko
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Philip L. RothCynthia LeeSusan J. AshfordEdwin A. LockeElizabeth FrederickDenise PotoskyCraig J. RussellChad H. Van Iddekinge
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (19 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers)Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (12 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAcademy of Management Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Philip Bobko
131 papers receiving 6.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.6k
- Social Psychology 1.7k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.5k
- General Health Professions 831
- Gender Studies 690
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Bobko
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Bobko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Bobko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Bobko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Bobko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Bobko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Bobko. The network helps show where Philip Bobko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Bobko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Bobko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Bobko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Bobko. Philip Bobko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | Using Beta Coefficients to Impute Missing Correlation Coefficients in Meta-Analytic Research: Reasons for Caution | 2 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 135 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 89 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Philip Bobko
Philip Bobko is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Decision Sciences and Applied Psychology, having authored 140 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.6k citations), Applied Psychology (661 citations) and Social Psychology (1.7k citations). Philip Bobko has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Philip L. Roth, Cynthia Lee, Susan J. Ashford, Cynthia Lee, Edwin A. Locke, Elizabeth Frederick, Denise Potosky, Craig J. Russell, Chad H. Van Iddekinge and Maury A. Buster. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Academy of Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.