Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Patricia M. King
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia M. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia M. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia M. King. The network helps show where Patricia M. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patricia M. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patricia M. King.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patricia M. King based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patricia M. King. Patricia M. King is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
King, Patricia M., et al.. (2014). Situacionismo y libertad. 10(20). 49–56.
5.
Magolda, Marcia B. Baxter & Patricia M. King. (2012). Special Issue: Assessing Meaning Making and Self-Authorship--Theory, Research, and Application.. 38(3). 1–138.16 indexed citations
Magolda, Marcia B. Baxter, et al.. (2010). Practices that Provide Effective Academic Challenge for First-Year Students.. Journal on excellence in college teaching. 21(2). 45–65.1 indexed citations
King, Patricia M. & Marcia B. Baxter Magolda. (1999). A Developmental Perspective on Learning.. Journal of college student development. 40(5). 599–609.64 indexed citations
13.
King, Patricia M.. (1997). Character and Civic Education: What Does It Take?.. Educational record. 78(9). 87–93.16 indexed citations
14.
King, Patricia M.. (1994). Theories of College Student Development: Sequences and Consequences.. Journal of college student development. 35(6).18 indexed citations
15.
King, Patricia M., et al.. (1992). Are White Students Really More Involved in Collegiate Experiences than Black Students. Journal of college student development. 33(4).15 indexed citations
16.
King, Patricia M.. (1992). How Do We Know? Why Do We Believe? Learning to Make Reflective Judgments.. Liberal education. 78(1). 2–9.14 indexed citations
17.
King, Patricia M., et al.. (1991). Guide to the transcripts of the Black women oral history project.1 indexed citations
18.
King, Patricia M.. (1984). Performance planning & appraisal : a how-to book for managers. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).2 indexed citations
King, Patricia M., et al.. (1980). A Framework for Student Development: From Student Development Goals to Educational Opportunity Practice.. Journal of College Student Personnel. 21(6).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.