Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind
19883.1k citationsMary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy et al.Curriculum Inquiryprofile →
Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind.
19881.6k citationsSusan A. Ostrander, Mary Field Belenky et al.Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Blythe McVicker Clinchy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Blythe McVicker Clinchy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blythe McVicker Clinchy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blythe McVicker Clinchy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Blythe McVicker Clinchy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blythe McVicker Clinchy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blythe McVicker Clinchy. The network helps show where Blythe McVicker Clinchy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Blythe McVicker Clinchy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Blythe McVicker Clinchy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Blythe McVicker Clinchy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Blythe McVicker Clinchy. Blythe McVicker Clinchy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clinchy, Blythe McVicker. (1996). Connected and separate knowing: Toward a marriage of two minds..45 indexed citations
6.
Goldberger, Nancy, Jill Mattuck Tarule, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, & Mary Field Belenky. (1996). Knowledge, Difference, And Power: Essays Inspired By Women's Ways Of Knowing. Medical Entomology and Zoology.226 indexed citations
7.
Clinchy, Blythe McVicker. (1995). Goals 2000: The Student as Object.. Phi Delta Kappan. 76(5). 383.6 indexed citations
Belenky, Mary Field, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, & Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1988). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Hypatia. 3(2).367 indexed citations
12.
Ostrander, Susan A., Mary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, & Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1988). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 17(6). 745–745.1554 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Belenky, Mary Field, et al.. (1988). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Curriculum Inquiry. 18(1). 113–113.3135 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Harding, Sandra, Mary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, & Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1987). Struggling for Self-Definition. The Women s Review of Books. 4(6). 6–6.2 indexed citations
Clinchy, Blythe McVicker. (1975). The Role of Intuition in Learning.. NEA today.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.