Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind
19883.1k citationsMary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy et al.Curriculum Inquiryprofile →
Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind.
19881.6k citationsSusan A. Ostrander, Mary Field Belenky et al.Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Goldberger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Goldberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Goldberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Goldberger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Goldberger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Goldberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Goldberger. The network helps show where Nancy Goldberger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Goldberger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Goldberger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Goldberger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Goldberger. Nancy Goldberger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vera, Elizabeth, et al.. (2012). Exploring the Educational Involvement of Parents of English Learners.. ScholarWorks (Walden University). 22(2). 183–202.54 indexed citations
6.
Goldberger, Nancy, Jill Mattuck Tarule, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, & Mary Field Belenky. (1996). Knowledge, Difference, And Power: Essays Inspired By Women's Ways Of Knowing. Medical Entomology and Zoology.226 indexed citations
7.
Goldberger, Nancy, et al.. (1995). The Culture and Psychology Reader. Medical Entomology and Zoology.272 indexed citations
8.
Belenky, Mary Field, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, & Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1988). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Hypatia. 3(2).367 indexed citations
9.
Ostrander, Susan A., Mary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, & Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1988). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 17(6). 745–745.1554 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Belenky, Mary Field, et al.. (1988). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Curriculum Inquiry. 18(1). 113–113.3135 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Harding, Sandra, Mary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, & Jill Mattuck Tarule. (1987). Struggling for Self-Definition. The Women s Review of Books. 4(6). 6–6.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.