O. C. Brenner

25 papers receiving 878 citations

Peers

O. C. Brenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Gender Studies 610
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 378
  • Sociology and Political Science 360
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 217
  • Social Psychology 180
Replace Ellen A. Fagenson with:
Ellen A. Fagenson United States
Meghna Virick United States
Margaret M. Hopkins United States
Lakshmi Ramarajan United States
Cynthia G. Emrich United States
Mary L. Connerley United States
Leonard H. Chusmir United States
Greg J. Sears Canada
Roxana Barbulescu France
Aline D. Masuda Spain
O. C. Brenner relative to Ellen A. Fagenson United States Ellen A. Fagenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ellen A. Fagenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. C. Brenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. C. Brenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. C. Brenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. C. Brenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. C. Brenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. C. Brenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. C. Brenner. The network helps show where O. C. Brenner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of O. C. Brenner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of O. C. Brenner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of O. C. Brenner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with O. C. Brenner. O. C. Brenner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 29
2
Perceived Fulfillment of Organizational Employment versus Entrepreneurship: Work Values and Career Intentions of Business College Graduates
121
3 5
4 5
5 7
6 364
7
Career Repotters: To Know Them Could Be to Keep Them.
1
8 3
9 1
10 134
11 16
12
WISC-R profile analysis in differentiating LD from ED children.
13
13 0
14 5
15
Organizational Dilemma: Sex Differences in Attitudes toward Women Held by Future Managers.
6
16 35
17 25
18 2
19 23
20 60

About O. C. Brenner

O. C. Brenner is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (14 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (610 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (378 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (217 citations). O. C. Brenner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Tomkiewicz, Virginia E. Schein, Nicholas J. Beutell, Jeffrey H. Greenhaus, Charles D. Pringle, George E. Stevens, W. Edgar Vinacke, Marc Singer and James D. Esinhart. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026