Norma L. Day‐Vines
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Education top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Cheryl Moore‐ThomasJulia BryanCheryl Holcomb‐McCoyLaurie CraigenSusannah M. WoodTim GrothausKylie P. Dotson-BlakeDana Griffin
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (19 papers)Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (9 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Norma L. Day‐Vines
32 papers receiving 913 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Social Psychology 568
- Education 479
- Clinical Psychology 408
- Sociology and Political Science 270
- Safety Research 122
Countries citing papers authored by Norma L. Day‐Vines
This map shows the geographic impact of Norma L. Day‐Vines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norma L. Day‐Vines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norma L. Day‐Vines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Norma L. Day‐Vines
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norma L. Day‐Vines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norma L. Day‐Vines. The network helps show where Norma L. Day‐Vines may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norma L. Day‐Vines
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norma L. Day‐Vines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norma L. Day‐Vines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norma L. Day‐Vines. Norma L. Day‐Vines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 69 | |
| 6 | 70 | |
| 7 | 137 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | African American English: Implications for School Counseling Professionals | 3 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 215 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | The Healthy Relationships Program: Preventing Sexual Assault of Youth. | 1 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Conflict Resolution: The Value of Diversity in the Recruitment, Selection, and Training of Peer Mediators. | 14 |
About Norma L. Day‐Vines
Norma L. Day‐Vines is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (19 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (568 citations), General Psychology (26 citations) and Clinical Psychology (408 citations). Norma L. Day‐Vines has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Moore‐Thomas, Julia Bryan, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, Laurie Craigen, Susannah M. Wood, Tim Grothaus, Kylie P. Dotson-Blake, Dana Griffin, Fallon Cluxton‐Keller and Veronica Terriquez. Their work appears in journals such as School Psychology Review, Journal of Counseling & Development and Remedial and Special Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.