Norma L. Day‐Vines

1.8k citations
35 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 16

Norma L. Day‐Vines

32 papers receiving 913 citations

Peers

Norma L. Day‐Vines
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Social Psychology 568
  • General Psychology 26
  • Clinical Psychology 408
  • Education 479
  • Safety Research 122
Replace Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy with:
Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy United States
Douglas A. Guiffrida United States
Lewis Z. Schlosser United States
Jeffrey A. Daniels United States
Rafe McCullough United States
Charlene M. Alexander United States
Colette T. Dollarhide United States
Michael D’Andrea United States
Richard Q. Shin United States
Farah A. Ibrahim United States
Norma L. Day‐Vines relative to Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy United States Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Norma L. Day‐Vines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norma L. Day‐Vines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norma L. Day‐Vines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norma L. Day‐Vines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norma L. Day‐Vines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norma L. Day‐Vines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norma L. Day‐Vines. The network helps show where Norma L. Day‐Vines may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Norma L. Day‐Vines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Norma L. Day‐Vines Line = papers co-authored together Norma L. Day‐Vines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20233
3 20221
4 202059
5 201869
6 201270
7 2011137
8 201032
9 20105
10
African American English: Implications for School Counseling Professionals
20093
11 200911
12 200833
13 20070
14 20079
15 2007215
16 200331
17 200222
18
The Healthy Relationships Program: Preventing Sexual Assault of Youth.
20011
19 200010
20
Conflict Resolution: The Value of Diversity in the Recruitment, Selection, and Training of Peer Mediators.
199614

About Norma L. Day‐Vines

Norma L. Day‐Vines is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (19 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (7 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (5 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (568 citations), General Psychology (26 citations) and Clinical Psychology (408 citations). Norma L. Day‐Vines has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Moore‐Thomas, Julia Bryan, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, Laurie Craigen, Susannah M. Wood, Tim Grothaus, Kylie P. Dotson-Blake, Dana Griffin, Fallon Cluxton‐Keller and Veronica Terriquez. Their work appears in journals such as School Psychology Review, Journal of Counseling & Development and Remedial and Special Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026