Cheryl Moore‐Thomas

866 total citations
18 papers, 504 citations indexed

About

Cheryl Moore‐Thomas is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cheryl Moore‐Thomas has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 504 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Education, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Cheryl Moore‐Thomas's work include Parental Involvement in Education (7 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers). Cheryl Moore‐Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Parental Involvement in Education (7 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers). Cheryl Moore‐Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States. Cheryl Moore‐Thomas's co-authors include Norma L. Day‐Vines, Julia Bryan, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, Dana Griffin, Jungnam Kim, Bradley T. Erford, Robert W. Lent and Natasha Mitchell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Counseling & Development, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development and Counselor Education and Supervision.

In The Last Decade

Cheryl Moore‐Thomas

17 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cheryl Moore‐Thomas United States 11 375 183 165 123 118 18 504
Susan R. Sy United States 13 424 1.1× 119 0.7× 201 1.2× 187 1.5× 77 0.7× 18 599
Blaire Cholewa United States 10 297 0.8× 144 0.8× 102 0.6× 77 0.6× 67 0.6× 20 416
Mary H. Buckingham United States 9 170 0.5× 140 0.8× 126 0.8× 85 0.7× 189 1.6× 11 389
Mano Candappa United Kingdom 11 273 0.7× 136 0.7× 145 0.9× 207 1.7× 62 0.5× 25 420
Rachel M. Hershberg United States 13 195 0.5× 127 0.7× 125 0.8× 148 1.2× 205 1.7× 32 451
Margaret Zoller Booth United States 10 216 0.6× 92 0.5× 106 0.6× 101 0.8× 76 0.6× 25 412
Erik M. Hines United States 12 351 0.9× 144 0.8× 133 0.8× 134 1.1× 149 1.3× 59 522
Alice J. Davidson United States 10 162 0.4× 158 0.9× 98 0.6× 66 0.5× 81 0.7× 15 337
Sara Douglass United States 14 278 0.7× 134 0.7× 223 1.4× 474 3.9× 73 0.6× 16 620
Kevin A. Tate United States 10 188 0.5× 129 0.7× 60 0.4× 79 0.6× 110 0.9× 20 333

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Moore‐Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Moore‐Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Moore‐Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Moore‐Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Moore‐Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. The network helps show where Cheryl Moore‐Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Moore‐Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Moore‐Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. Cheryl Moore‐Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Bryan, Julia, Norma L. Day‐Vines, Dana Griffin, & Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. (2012). The Disproportionality Dilemma: Patterns of Teacher Referrals to School Counselors for Disruptive Behavior. Journal of Counseling & Development. 90(2). 177–190. 70 indexed citations
2.
Bryan, Julia, et al.. (2012). The Effects of School Bonding on High School Seniors’ Academic Achievement. Journal of Counseling & Development. 90(4). 467–480. 88 indexed citations
3.
Bryan, Julia, Cheryl Moore‐Thomas, Norma L. Day‐Vines, & Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy. (2011). School Counselors as Social Capital: The Effects of High School College Counseling on College Application Rates. Journal of Counseling & Development. 89(2). 190–199. 137 indexed citations
4.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl, et al.. (2010). Children's Perceptions of Peers with Disabilities.. 6(3). 13 indexed citations
5.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl & Norma L. Day‐Vines. (2010). Culturally Competent Collaboration: School Counselor Collaboration with African American Families and Communities. Professional School Counseling. 14(1). 53–63. 32 indexed citations
6.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl & Norma L. Day‐Vines. (2010). Culturally Competent Collaboration: School Counselor Collaboration with African American Families and Communities. Professional School Counseling. 14(1). 5 indexed citations
7.
Bryan, Julia, Norma L. Day‐Vines, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, & Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. (2010). Using National Education Longitudinal Data Sets in School Counseling Research. Counselor Education and Supervision. 49(4). 266–279. 15 indexed citations
8.
Bryan, Julia, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, Cheryl Moore‐Thomas, & Norma L. Day‐Vines. (2009). Who Sees the School Counselor for College Information? A National Study. Professional School Counseling. 12(4). 11 indexed citations
9.
Bryan, Julia, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, Cheryl Moore‐Thomas, & Norma L. Day‐Vines. (2009). Who Sees the School Counselor for College Information? A National Study. Professional School Counseling. 12(4). 280–291. 69 indexed citations
10.
Bryan, Julia, Cheryl Moore‐Thomas, Norma L. Day‐Vines, Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy, & Natasha Mitchell. (2009). Characteristics of Students Who Receive School Counseling Services: Implications for Practice and Research.. 7(21). 7 indexed citations
11.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl & Norma L. Day‐Vines. (2008). Culturally Competent Counseling for Religious and Spiritual African American Adolescents. Professional School Counseling. 11(3).
12.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl & Norma L. Day‐Vines. (2008). Culturally Competent Counseling for Religious and Spiritual African American Adolescents. Professional School Counseling. 11(3). 159–165. 17 indexed citations
13.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl & Robert W. Lent. (2007). Middle School Students' Expectations About Counseling. Professional School Counseling. 10(4). 410–418. 7 indexed citations
14.
Erford, Bradley T., et al.. (2007). The Screening Test for Emotional Problems Studies of Reliability and Validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 39(4). 209–225. 10 indexed citations
15.
Moore‐Thomas, Cheryl & Robert W. Lent. (2007). Middle School Students’ Expectations about Counseling. Professional School Counseling. 10(4). 1 indexed citations
16.
Erford, Bradley T., et al.. (2007). Technical Analysis of the Reading Essential Skills Screener-Upper Elementary Version. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 40(1). 33–41. 2 indexed citations
17.
Erford, Bradley T. & Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. (2003). Testing FAQ: How to Answer Questions Parents Frequently Ask about Testing.. 1 indexed citations
18.
Holcomb‐McCoy, Cheryl & Cheryl Moore‐Thomas. (2001). Empowering African-American Adolescent Females.. Professional School Counseling. 5(1). 19–26. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026