This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Seftor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Seftor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Seftor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Seftor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Seftor. The network helps show where Neil Seftor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Seftor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Seftor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Seftor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Seftor. Neil Seftor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Seftor, Neil, et al.. (2016). The What Works Clearinghouse: New Strategies to Support Non-Researchers in Using Rigorous Research in Education Decision-Making.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.1 indexed citations
Seftor, Neil. (2016). What Does It Mean When a Study Finds No Effects? REL 2017-265..2 indexed citations
5.
Seftor, Neil. (2016). Raising the Bar. Evaluation Review. 41(3). 212–239.7 indexed citations
6.
Agodini, Roberto, et al.. (2013). After Two Years, Three Elementary Math Curricula Outperform a Fourth. NCEE Evaluation Brief. NCEE 2013-4019..4 indexed citations
7.
Seftor, Neil & Juan Carlos Calcagno. (2010). The Impacts of Upward Bound Math-Science on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years after Scheduled High School Graduation: Final Report..2 indexed citations
8.
Seftor, Neil, Arif Mamun, & Allen L. Schirm. (2009). The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.32 indexed citations
9.
Seftor, Neil, Arif Mamun, & Allen L. Schirm. (2009). The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes Seven to Nine Years after Scheduled High School Graduation. Final Report..11 indexed citations
10.
Seftor, Neil, et al.. (2007). Upward Bound Math-Science Program: Description and Interim Impact Estimates. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.10 indexed citations
11.
Glazerman, Steven, et al.. (2006). Design of an Impact Evaluation of Teacher Induction Programs. Final Report.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.7 indexed citations
12.
Constantine, Jill, et al.. (2006). A Study of the Effect of Talent Search on Secondary and Postsecondary Outcomes in Florida, Indiana, and Texas. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.2 indexed citations
13.
Constantine, Jill, et al.. (2006). Study of the Effect of the Talent Search Program on Secondary and Postsecondary Outcomes in Florida, Indiana and Texas. Final Report from Phase II of the National Evaluation..22 indexed citations
14.
Myers, David E., Robert B. Olsen, Neil Seftor, Julie Young, & Christina Clark Tuttle. (2004). The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound: Results from the Third Follow-Up Data Collection. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.37 indexed citations
15.
Myers, David, et al.. (2004). The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound: Results from the Third Follow-Up Data Collection. MPR Reference No. 8464-600.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.1 indexed citations
16.
Seftor, Neil & Daniel P. Mayer. (2003). The Effect of Alternative Certification on Student Achievement: A Literature Review. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.