Steven Glazerman
- Education top 1%
- School Choice and Performance 25
- Education Systems and Policy 20
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 14
- Higher Education Research Studies 7
- Parental Involvement in Education 6
-
- Educational Assessment and Improvement 5
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
-
- Diverse Educational Innovations Studies 7
-
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Paul T. DeckerDaniel P. MayerDavid MyersDan LevyAmy JohnsonMartha BleekerMary GriderEric Isenberg
- Journals
- Education Finance and Policy (2 papers)Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (1 paper)The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Steven Glazerman
45 papers receiving 888 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Education 824
- Information Systems and Management 118
- Statistics and Probability 133
- Safety Research 82
- Public Administration 23
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Glazerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Glazerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Glazerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Glazerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Glazerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Glazerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Glazerman. The network helps show where Steven Glazerman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven Glazerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Market Signals: How Do DC Parents Rank Schools, and What Does It Mean for Policy? Policy Brief. | 2016 | 2 |
| 2 | Transfer Incentives for High-Performing Teachers: Final Results from a Multisite Randomized Experiment. NCEE 2014-4003. | 2013 | 21 |
| 3 | Transfer Incentives for High-Performing Teachers: Final Results from a Multisite Randomized Experiment. Executive Summary. NCEE 2014-4004. | 2013 | 4 |
| 4 | Transfer Incentives for High-Performing Teachers: Final Results from a Multisite Randomized Experiment | 2013 | 30 |
| 5 | An Evaluation of the Chicago Teacher Advancement Program (Chicago TAP) after Four Years. Final Report. | 2012 | 15 |
| 6 | Do Low-Income Students Have Equal Access to the Highest-Performing Teachers? NCEE Evaluation Brief. NCEE 2011-4016. | 2011 | 5 |
| 7 | False Performance Gains: A Critique of Successive Cohort Indicators. Working Paper. | 2011 | 1 |
| 8 | Do Low-Income Students Have Equal Access to the Highest-Performing Teachers? Technical Appendix. NCEE 2011-4016. | 2011 | 1 |
| 9 | Impacts of Performance Pay Under the Teacher Incentive Fund: Study Design Report | 2011 | 6 |
| 10 | An Evaluation of the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) in Chicago: Year Two Impact Report. | 2010 | 31 |
| 11 | Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Controlled Study | 2010 | 97 |
| 12 | Effects of the Missouri Career Ladder Program on Teacher Mobility | 2009 | 2 |
| 13 | Does the Missouri Teacher Career Ladder Program Raise Student Achievement | 2009 | 2 |
| 14 | An Evaluation of the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) in Chicago: Year One Impact Report. Final Report. | 2009 | 3 |
| 15 | Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Results from the Second Year of a Randomized Controlled Study | 2009 | 45 |
| 16 | Passport to Teaching: Career Choices and Experiences of American Board Certified Teachers. Final Report. MPR Reference No. 6215-030. | 2008 | 1 |
| 17 | An Evaluation of American Board Teacher Certification Progress and Plans | 2006 | 4 |
| 18 | School Principals Perspectives on the Passport to Teaching | 2006 | 2 |
| 19 | Design of an Impact Evaluation of Teacher Induction Programs. Final Report. | 2006 | 7 |
| 20 | The Effects of Teach For America on Students: Findings from a National Evaluation | 2004 | 153 |
About Steven Glazerman
Steven Glazerman is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Information Systems and Management, Statistics and Probability and Gender Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (25 papers), Education Systems and Policy (20 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (14 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (7 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (6 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (5 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (824 citations), Information Systems and Management (118 citations), Statistics and Probability (133 citations), Safety Research (82 citations) and Public Administration (23 citations). Steven Glazerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul T. Decker, Daniel P. Mayer, David Myers, Dan Levy, Amy Johnson, Martha Bleeker, Mary Grider, Eric Isenberg, Sarah Dolfin and Jeffrey E. Max. Their work appears in journals such as Education Finance and Policy, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management and Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.