The Journal of Human Resources

2.7k papers and 140.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in The Journal of Human Resources in the last decades have received a total of 140.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Human Resources usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.2k papers), Gender Studies (761 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (705 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (680 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (571 papers) and School Choice and Performance (293 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Human Resources are Alan S. Blinder, Duncan Thomas, David Neumark, James J. Heckman, Douglas L. Miller, A. Colin Cameron, Eric A. Hanushek, John Cawley, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge and George J. Borjas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Human Resources

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Human Resources. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Human Resources.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Human Resources

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Human Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Human Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Human Resources more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025